|
|
#11 (permalink) | |
|
Orc's Breathmint
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 110
Reputation: 10
|
Quote:
I don't think "they look cooler" makes any sence... They could just as easily make overalls which look crap, and a top+bottom combo which looks cool... Each set of armor has its own unique look, and whether it looks good or not has nothing to do with if its an overall or a top+bottom combo... But having said that, I personally would prefer more overall options for Warriors, simply because then if you wanted to scroll for DEX you wouldnt be stuck with Crusader Chainmail / Dragon Robe all the way until lvl 80... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) | |
|
SuperKenshin's Servent
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,027
Reputation: 12
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) |
|
Lives in City of Zeroes
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 645
Reputation: 11
|
Whats the point, warriors are big, fat and overpowered enough. (No offence to any warrior) And they slap stuff to death with their little puny hammers all day. Whats the fun of that when you can be a stupid bunnyhopping savage blowing retard? That is so much more fun.
And yes, most overalls are better, but the lvl 20 one is FUGLAY
__________________
ArChChAoSx
Honorary Member ![]() ![]() Post count: 1013 Since 2.28.2005 http://xPerigryn.Deviantart.Com ![]() OnRPG is 90% noobs. Put this in your sig if you're part of the 90% ![]() |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|