I wouldn't try running Source.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by GrandHustle
Which is the better deal
|
The Counter Strike Anthology, obviously.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by GrandHustle
which game is better
|
Depends on what type of game you're looking for.. Call of Duty is alot more fast paced than CS and is more of a run and gun type game. Counter Strike isn't "realistic" but more so than Call of Duty. Counter Strike doesn't have a
real single player, though. So if you're looking to go thru a story line get Call of Duty, for sure.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by GrandHustle
more fun
|
I've been playing CS (Including Source) since about 1999.. I probably played Call of Duty for alittle less than a year.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by GrandHustle
more challenging
|
Don't listen to half of these people on onRPG, Counter Strike is
so much more challenging than Call of Duty. Since I've been playing, I've been in countless Main, IM and Open teams.. I haven't played "seriously" in years, but if you're looking for a challenge, go with CS. People have been playing this game for
years.. and if you've
never played CS before pubbing will probably be challenging at first, much less playing in any leagues.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by GrandHustle
better graphically
|
What? I'm guessing you're asking what game has better graphics? Here-
The top is Call of Duty, bottom CS.. Call of Duty looks alot better. >>;
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by GrandHustle
more active
|
1.6 is
very active.. for some reason I
highly doubt Call of Duty is anywhere as active as 1.6 is.. tons of people still play. The only reason it's behind on xfire is probably because xfire isn't really needed anymore with the new (Not really anymore.. :c) Steam overlay.
I'd go with 1.6 for sure, they're both great games, even to this date.. but I honestly think you'll get alot more bang for your buck with CS. x3