|
|
#63 (permalink) |
|
Eriond's Egotist
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: The Cage, Rucker Park, or Venice Beach.
Posts: 1,733
Reputation: 16
|
I'm personally not sure how cloning is at all effective in resurrecting a specie of animal.
By producing animals simply by cloning, all the animals will have the exact same genes and traits, leading to incest and shit. The gene pool would be so narrow that a simple disease could VERY easily, quickly, and effectively wipe out the specie once again. Similar to the tasmanian devil epidemic, in which the species was so inbred that a form of contagious cancer ravaged the population. |
|
|
|
|
|
#64 (permalink) | |
|
Lives in City of Zeroes
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 672
Reputation: 16
|
Quote:
also if the clones lived long enough (like 100s of years) would they not evolve to become immune to things? waste of time i know but still haha |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#66 (permalink) | |
|
Lives in City of Zeroes
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 672
Reputation: 16
|
Quote:
i think the only thing clones would be good for are extra organs and body parts if thats applicable. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#67 (permalink) |
|
Eriond's Egotist
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: The Cage, Rucker Park, or Venice Beach.
Posts: 1,733
Reputation: 16
|
Well yeah, what I meant was that the clones as a specie would not last that long. Some kind of disease will wipe them out before that.
And if it isn't one disease, then it's another, because they all share the exact same genes. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|