Free MMORPG Forums

Norrin Radd · 03-14-2009, 09:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deimos

you have to admit though loli that depicts children of ages 10 years and less is pretty sick.

no matter how early you say puberty starts there is no excuse for that. the human body simply isnt geared naturally to be attracted to 10 year olds.

dont tell me that its just a fantasy. sex is an instinctive and biological urge but it doesnt urge you to shag a ten year old or someone younger than that.

you can blab all you want about murder and violence on TV but thats a totally different issue.

its a law in the UK and a fact that at the age of ten a child can tell the difference between right and wrong. it forms the basis on how children are charged with various crimes. under tens are treated differently from those aged 10+. its a fact, its a part of our society. its been made a law because human beings dont have a natural urge to kill each other, same as animals of other species dont have a natural urge to kill on a whim with a glock at their highschool.

but sex is different. its hardwired into everyone. and to be attracted to children of that age is not natural.

I don't particularly care what anyone jerks off to. They aren't the problem.

The problem people are those MAKING the stuff.

Paedophilia is ingrained in the media anyway. They act like it's the worst crime ever, but they're all in on it.

All these U.K. "glamour models" appearing in FHM and Nuts, they all look about 15, facially.

People think that by waiting 'til a girl is 18, it changes things. It doesn't, you were attracted before, clearly.

To me, it doesn't hurt anyone if you're attracted to a young teen, so long as you don't intend to unwillingly harm anyone.

holy11 · 03-14-2009, 09:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TrollMasta

xD one of my friends looks like she's 18 when she's barely in HS rofl

That was a little random bro..

Ronin · 03-14-2009, 10:22 PM

I don't really think that the "protection" of kids ranging somewhat from 14 to 18 is about the being of it "unnatural" or anything of that kind.

The issues that I see are different.

From the beginning of puberty, children are having a possibly active sex-life.
There is not really much unnatural about that, in the opposite.

What is making an adult who seduces a kid of that age a violator is something different.

Anything that happens to the kid leaves a psychological unreleasable mark. That is the difference between a kid and an adult and why kids need to be protected until they have "grown up".

Not because sex would be harming them physically or be in a physical sense unnatural, but because the chance of severely traumatizing and damaging a kids mental health for it's full future life.

Deimos · 03-14-2009, 10:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Norrin Radd

I don't particularly care what anyone jerks off to. They aren't the problem.

The problem people are those MAKING the stuff.

Paedophilia is ingrained in the media anyway. They act like it's the worst crime ever, but they're all in on it.

All these U.K. "glamour models" appearing in FHM and Nuts, they all look about 15, facially.

People think that by waiting 'til a girl is 18, it changes things. It doesn't, you were attracted before, clearly.

To me, it doesn't hurt anyone if you're attracted to a young teen, so long as you don't intend to unwillingly harm anyone.

yeah i suppose so.

but your right about those where the buck starts. i mean making sexually explicit (or implicit) images or whatever depicting 10 year olds has so many things wrong with it. just because there is a market for it doesnt mean you should exploit it so rampantly and without any remorse. but then im strongly against the minority judging for the majority what is acceptable so i guess its something we have to live with.

Civil · 03-14-2009, 11:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deimos

yeah i suppose so.

but your right about those where the buck starts. i mean making sexually explicit (or implicit) images or whatever depicting 10 year olds has so many things wrong with it. just because there is a market for it doesnt mean you should exploit it so rampantly and without any remorse. but then im strongly against the minority judging for the majority what is acceptable so i guess its something we have to live with.

It's still pretty ****ing pathetic when an 18 year old dates 12-14 year olds, like in my school.

03-14-2009, 10:22 PM	#133 (permalink)
Ronin OnRPG Elite Member! Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Hitman Victor Posts: 4,922 Reputation: 302	I don't really think that the "protection" of kids ranging somewhat from 14 to 18 is about the being of it "unnatural" or anything of that kind. The issues that I see are different. From the beginning of puberty, children are having a possibly active sex-life. There is not really much unnatural about that, in the opposite. What is making an adult who seduces a kid of that age a violator is something different. Anything that happens to the kid leaves a psychological unreleasable mark. That is the difference between a kid and an adult and why kids need to be protected until they have "grown up". Not because sex would be harming them physically or be in a physical sense unnatural, but because the chance of severely traumatizing and damaging a kids mental health for it's full future life. __________________ Stay frosty.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode