Go Back   OnRPG Free MMORPG Forums > Main Category > General

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-09-2009, 09:07 PM   #1 (permalink)
Cingal's Collar
 
Lorek's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Dunbarton
Posts: 1,505
Reputation: 20
Send a message via MSN to Lorek
Default Is lolicon illegal in America?

This is a serious question.

We were having a discussion on ventrilo and none of us are really sure.


For those of you who dont know what lolicon is.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lolicon
__________________


NADragon Nest: Name: Lorek
NAMabinogi: Ruari | Name:Lorek - Retired
TWMabinogi: 貝婷伺服器 | Name:Kuchiki - Retired


Lorek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2009, 09:08 PM   #2 (permalink)
OnRPG Elite Member!
 
Useless's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 6,217
Reputation: 112
Send a message via MSN to Useless
Default

Well...that is pretty much pedophilia and last time I checked it was a serious offense.
__________________
Useless is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2009, 09:10 PM   #3 (permalink)
| (• ◡•)| (❍ᴥ❍ʋ)
 
Oisterboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Just Past Jupiter
Posts: 16,555
Reputation: 644
Send a message via AIM to Oisterboy Send a message via MSN to Oisterboy
Default

I'm pretty sure its legal here.
__________________
Oisterboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2009, 09:10 PM   #4 (permalink)
Cingal's Collar
 
Lorek's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Dunbarton
Posts: 1,505
Reputation: 20
Send a message via MSN to Lorek
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oisterboy View Post
I'm pretty sure its legal here.
Same here. Someone thought he saw something on CNN that said it was illegal =/
__________________


NADragon Nest: Name: Lorek
NAMabinogi: Ruari | Name:Lorek - Retired
TWMabinogi: 貝婷伺服器 | Name:Kuchiki - Retired


Lorek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2009, 09:11 PM   #5 (permalink)
TerrinBlaze's Treasure
 
Elegance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Equestria
Posts: 4,043
Reputation: 128
Send a message via MSN to Elegance
Default

I'm almost positive it's legal.
It's the only genre I remember being either so widely hated, or illegal. One of the two. =/
__________________
Elegance is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2009, 09:11 PM   #6 (permalink)
| (• ◡•)| (❍ᴥ❍ʋ)
 
Oisterboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Just Past Jupiter
Posts: 16,555
Reputation: 644
Send a message via AIM to Oisterboy Send a message via MSN to Oisterboy
Default

Quote:
"Recently in America there's been quite some furor over the legality of fictional, illustrated depictions of sex involving children. Uncertainty may be reaching a boiling point because of recent federal government attempts to study the accessibility of pornography to minors and Google's refusal to submit search results that may include personal, private information, to a government inquiry. I'm neither a lawyer nor a specialist on observing judiciary or legal proceedings. In observation of the precision of the question, I'll avoid injecting subjective opinion. With those stipulations in place I'll state that as far as I'm aware, Japanese lolicon art is still legal in America on a broad, nationwide scale.

The Child Online Protection Act of 1998 was designed to protect children from being exposed to online pornography. However, in 1998, 1999, 2002, 2003, and 2004 the act was consistently struck down as unconstitutional and "too broad" by federal courts. More recently, the PROTECT act of 2003 (Prosecutorial Remedies and Other Tools to end the Exploitation of Children Today) is designed to, "Revise and strengthen the prohibition on 'virtual' child pornography," and, "Prohibit any obscene materials that depict children" (Dept. of Justice memo). The loosely defined principle that the PROTECT act of 2003 prohibits computer-generated child pornography and illustrated lolicon has led numerous people to assume that lolicon is now illegal in America.

However, examination of the literal PROTECT act, and awareness of the previous judicial bans on enforcement of prohibition of fictional depictions of child sexuality paint a different story. Although the PROTECT act was signed into law by President George W. Bush on April 30, 2003, the 2004 Ashcroft v. American Civil Liberties Union Supreme Court ruling once again determined that a ban on fictional illustrations is unconstitutional. Furthermore, section 504 subsection 1466A of the PROTECT act of 2003 clarifies that "drawing" or "cartoon" visual representations of child sexual abuse must depict a minor involved in sexual activity, be obscene, and lack "serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value" in order to violate the law. Beside the fact that the US Supreme Court has already determined this section of the PROTECT act to be unconstitutional, imported Japanese lolicon art would still have to be legally proven "obscene" and lacking in "literary, artistic" value in order to be deemed illegal. To the furthest extent of my knowledge, that has never occurred on a federal level in America.

So as far as I'm aware, the national legal status of imported Japanese lolicon art in America has not changed. It's still legal to sell and own because it is a form of free speech protected by the constitutional First Amendment. The belief that the legal status of lolicon art in America has changed, I suspect, is based on a superficial understanding of the 2003 PROTECT act, without research of its finer points or its execution." - John

This person is smart as hell and so far has proven 100% correct. I myself, will challenge this law as it IS unconstitutional, even though in reality it does not pertain to lolicon appropriately enough for a law suit. Swiftly and intelligently, lolicon shall continue to be legal and popular.

Not my words.
__________________
Oisterboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2009, 09:12 PM   #7 (permalink)
The Devil's Advocate.
 
Cingal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Oh, you know, around.
Posts: 11,699
Reputation: 301
Send a message via AIM to Cingal
Default

18 USC Sec. 1466A
(a) In General. - Any person who, in a circumstance described in subsection (d), knowingly produces, distributes, receives, or possesses with intent to distribute, a visual depiction of any kind, including a drawing, cartoon, sculpture, or painting, that -
(1)(A) depicts a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct;
and
(B) is obscene; or
(2)(A) depicts an image that is, or appears to be, of a minor engaging in graphic bestiality, sadistic or masochistic abuse, or sexual intercourse, including genital-genital, oral-genital, anal-genital, or oral-anal, whether between persons of the same or opposite sex; and
(B) lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value;
or attempts or conspires to do so, shall be subject to the penalties provided in section 2252A(b)(1), including the penalties provided for cases involving a prior conviction.

Additionally, 18 USC Section 1466A(c) states that it is NOT required that the minor depicted actually exists. Fictional characters _are_ covered under this law.




Yes. It is.

And it's good that it is.
__________________
On nights like tonight, When no one's around.
I sit in the dark, with my hands on the ground.

And I smile like the devil smiles. Unseen but proud.

Last edited by Cingal; 03-09-2009 at 09:17 PM.
Cingal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2009, 09:22 PM   #8 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,884
Reputation: 221
Default

lolicon eh...

*faps*
Z0MBiE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2009, 09:28 PM   #9 (permalink)
OnRPG Elite Member!
 
Candyholic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: bel sverige
Posts: 6,218
Reputation: 182
Send a message via MSN to Candyholic
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Z0MBiE View Post
lolicon eh...

*faps*
hksmrchan ^
__________________

Candyholic is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2009, 09:38 PM   #10 (permalink)
| (• ◡•)| (❍ᴥ❍ʋ)
 
Oisterboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Just Past Jupiter
Posts: 16,555
Reputation: 644
Send a message via AIM to Oisterboy Send a message via MSN to Oisterboy
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Candyholic View Post
hksmrchan ^
Not.

Even.

Close.



__________________
Oisterboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 03:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0
OnRPG, Copyright ©2003-2011, Game Entertainment Enterprises