|
|
#201 (permalink) | |
|
Shadowsworn's Sandwich
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: onmypc@work.com
Posts: 1,858
Reputation: 32
|
Quote:
Besides that you're entitle to your opinion.
__________________
How Twilight should have ended:
![]() "Your opinion is like an asshole, I don't need to hear it" "The problem with non conformists is they’re all the same." Failentines: When Romance Goes Wrong www.testeagle.wordpress.com (WoW Blog) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#203 (permalink) | |
|
OnRPG Elite Member!
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Precious Bodily Fluids
Posts: 9,823
Reputation: 411
|
Quote:
the whole idea of drinking blood and turning into a bat and all those weird waistcoats is bram stokers invention. he chose those characteristics because they played upon peoples fears at the time. people were afraid of new fields of science and the ideas they brought with them so stoker incorporated those fears into his character. vampires are not real!!!! the same way that badguys change in movies over the years ie: early james bond movies have like some bad*ss british accent dude or guy with a secret lair, compared to now in which you get some terrorist/activist group doing bad stuff. badguys are created based on what people are afraid of at the time... stokers vampire was a culmination of peoples fears in the 19th century. modern depictions of vampires are an elaboration of this, its not reaaaaaaall. prior to 1897 vampires didnt even exist in literature!!!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#205 (permalink) |
|
OnRPG Elite Member!
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Hitman Victor
Posts: 4,922
Reputation: 302
|
That's like saying Goethe invented Dr. Faustus and maybe the devil; that's not really true at all.
Seeing that you say "modern"; What distinct feature did he change? He just selected a couple that fit the dramatics and when you read the book, it's pretty apparent that it is assumed to be known what a Vampire is (just not required). The whole scenario might be benefiting from being "exotic" somewhere else, but where I live is the regions where the first drafted plot was supposed to take place and it really isn't something he "invented" and just put in place at all, that would be giving him credit in a misguided way. On the appearance on literature: Literature as a medium was pretty irrelevant in the times before 1800 anyways, but you need to add, that you still will find much older notations. That the collection of the oral traditions of the common people happened at those times is a purely technical aspect. Naturally the technicalities and the medium shape the message; A somewhat unified picture of imagination appears, targeted groups shift, society changes, but that has nothing to do really with truth. Just like the 60s made it popular to identify flowers in graves of early humans as gifts, when it's now the common thought that those pollen found were brought into the graves by mice. Similarly the concept that the homo neanderthalensis was extinguished by the homo sapiens is an idea that was the "mental offspring" in human anthropology of the cold war times. It really all proves nothing, it just weakens the whole historical receptions as an argument in total; Also people were putting heavy stones on graves or sealing them otherwise for quite a long while before 1800. Last edited by Ronin; 04-02-2009 at 12:05 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#209 (permalink) | |
|
Pipster's Punk
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,442
Reputation: 80
|
Quote:
. People have their own individual beliefs. No matter how much you e-bate, they wont ever change their mind. At the moment, providing your facts and figures and whatnot are proving to be an entertaining read for those sitting on the sidelines, and preaching to the choir for those that choose not to believe.To each his own.~
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#210 (permalink) | |
|
OnRPG Elite Member!
|
Quote:
Anyway, i think the books were alright but the movies are ripping it all apart. And If the Jedi can have one, why not Cullenism? |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| edward, sexy |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|