Go Back   OnRPG Free MMORPG Forums > Main Category > General

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-17-2009, 02:58 AM   #21 (permalink)
Retired Staff
 
`doll's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,663
Reputation: 47
Default

Watched only 4 minutes.
Even if this is barely about Obama, I'm sure the title would give conservatives who haven't watched it reason to say "omgz Obama is deceiving us!!!!!"
`doll is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2009, 10:35 AM   #22 (permalink)
OnRPG Elite Member!
 
Ronin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Hitman Victor
Posts: 4,922
Reputation: 302
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gaika View Post
Edit: Try being less negative.

shadow says: YOU ARE TRICKSY
Hmm, I am just a little pissed lately for reading up on the Keynesian theories and that dood writes like he is a freaking novelist...

I was expecting some serious precise economic assertions and market theories, but all he says is anecdotal, vague and rather simple.
Adding to that he constantly makes statements, just to put them into perspective and disqualify them later, constantly diminishing and to parts rebutting his own point.

I think he was very aware about the fact that what he wrote wasn't to the point, rather than work-notes and buffoonery, that have no entitlement to be viewed as general;
It's sad, because much of it is the basis for many recent political actings, just because what he didn't mean to emphasis makes great slogans and also, to come back on topic:

If you have no idea of economics you easily misunderstand most of it for exactly what it has shaped to the max:
Conspiracy theories, with the "impression" to understand finance "for real", when they just misquote.
That is simply because it was fashionable, to put the talk of individual actors (in person; it still is, in populist politics as well as in similar presentation like in this video, cloaked up through a small amount of sophisms bare of substance), in front of the economic mechanics (again either for the sake of the anecdotal shape or, as comparisons that are in the same sentence often labeled indecisive). When it is than said that this isn't what's in case relevant, it goes unheard...

I never liked many of the Anglo-American influences on economic science (with exceptions; the parts in question don't hide their limits and still get soaked up like sermons), for being to vague and inexact gibberish, that lacks scientific rigor, but seeing it used is what puts the crown on top of it to form my opinion of nearly complete disagreement, to label it as economics.
__________________

Stay frosty.

Last edited by Ronin; 04-17-2009 at 10:46 AM.
Ronin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2009, 10:44 AM   #23 (permalink)
Eriond's Egotist
 
Fortify's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: USA, Maryland
Posts: 1,759
Reputation: 34
Default

Uh huh... because conservatives never did ANYTHING horribly deceiving... *cough 9/11 cough*
__________________
Fortify is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 05:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0
OnRPG, Copyright ©2003-2011, Game Entertainment Enterprises