|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
Eriond's Egotist
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,777
Reputation: 18
|
..... ...... ...... the potential amount of viruses that can and very well do reside in the cracks of a pirated windows 7 makes it an unwanted way to acquire it
__________________
You Sir Are Wrong, And If You Are Not Wrong, You Sir, Are Still Wrong
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) | |
|
Murxidon's Maid
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 2,125
Reputation: 74
|
Quote:
w7's awesome, i've got 32bit w7 rc beta installed on a shtty computer & it runs fine. got 64bit rc beta on a quad core with 8gb ram. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 (permalink) |
|
Murxidon's Maid
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 2,125
Reputation: 74
|
the required specs are much lower than vista, pretty much the same as xp. but somehow the shitty computer that i have w7 loaded on, it seems to run faster on w7 rather than xp. :/
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 (permalink) | |
|
Godly Viking Prince
Join Date: May 2006
Location: With the Smurfs
Posts: 9,925
Reputation: 150
|
Quote:
that only applies if your not smart enough to research it first or don't know where to look. I'm using Windows 7 RTM using a legit key(no crack) and its virus free and fast. the above statement only applies if you blindly go and download stuff from an untrusted source such as limewire or emule, or dodgy bit torrent sites. i should also warn you guys that talking about piracy is against the rules and to try and avoid making me warn you ![]() inregards to xp vs 7 yes windows 7 is indeed faster and the requirements to run are comparable to XP/2003. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|