|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Luigi’s Pizza
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 133
Reputation: 10
|
Hey, I usually don't play the CoD series until after CoD2, but I guess I might just have to accept the fact that it's a -good- game.
So I was wondering if I could run it? I went to canyourunit.com and I took a CODMW2 test. It said I could run it FAST? Which confuses me, considering canyourunit.com is very accurate, but this doesn't really make much sense to me because I'm using an integrated card atm. Here are my specs. * Minimum CPU Minimum: Intel Pentium 4 3.2 GHz or AMD Athlon 64 3200+ processor or better supported You Have: AMD Phenom(tm) 9100e Quad-Core Processor PASS CPU Speed Minimum: Intel Pentium 4 3.2GHz or AMD Athlon 64 3200+ processor or better supported You Have: 1.80 GHz Performance Rated at: 3.6 GHz PASS RAM Minimum: 1 GB You Have: 3.7 GB PASS OS Minimum: Microsoft Windows XP, Windows Vista and Windows 7 (Windows 95/98/ME/2000 are unsupported) You Have: Microsoft Windows Vista Home Premium Edition, 64-bit (Build Service Pack 16001) PASS Video Card Minimum: 256 MB NVIDIA GeForce 6600 GT or better or ATI Radeon 1600 XT or better You Have: ATI Radeon HD 3200 Graphics (0x9610) PASS Features: Minimum attributes of your Video Card Required You Have Hardware T&L Yes Yes Pixel Shader version 3.0 4.0 Vertex Shader version 3.0 4.0 Sound Card Minimum: Yes You Have: ATI HDMI Audio PASS Free Disk Space Minimum: 12 GB of free hard drive space You Have: 380.9 GB PASS Copy and Pasted from CANYOURUNIT |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Lives in City of Zeroes
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 644
Reputation: 26
|
Obviously you can run it. HOWEVER... it depends on a few things.
It compares chip types of one type, to other chip types of another type. If it has 1239182372 gigs of memory, but the GPU is slow as fvuck, then good luck. In theory, you can run it fine. However, your BEST bet is to GOOGLE up the chip speed of the recommended / minimum graphics card, and compare the features of yours. If it's better, or the same, then you can run it fine. It all depends on the hardware inside. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |
|
Loric's Lunatic
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,629
Reputation: 66
|
I beg to differ.
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/...t,1785-10.html The X1300 is pretty awful, and it's right behind the 3200HD(which you have) so logically the 1600xt would be above it, but I could be wrong, since there is no direct comparison. Also, I'm not sure that CoD:MW2 have multicore support, since you know, IW is pulling crap with the PC gamers' end and that CoD4 only supported 2 cores maxed, but it could change since everything changes.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Cloud's Hair Spray
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Singapore
Posts: 75
Reputation: 10
|
Hey, you can run it fine definitely.
Comparison wise, MW2 is more optimized and has a higher FPS than CoD4. I ran MW2 at Extra (Very High) settings, 2x AA but unchecked Soften Smoke Edges and Spectacular Map and it ran very smoothly. I used the same settings for CoD4 but the FPS is very low. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) | ||
|
Loric's Lunatic
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,629
Reputation: 66
|
Quote:
![]() Anyway, the minimum is the minimum, if you don't meet it, you shouldn't be able to play, unless you found like a mega super duper config, that lowers your graphics to like Runescape status, but that's no fun to play...
__________________
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|