Free MMORPG Forums

endgam3r

very well put Norg

The Art of War by Sun Tzu, 600 BC

*Pretend inferiority and encourage his arrogance.

__________________

gratscorpio

lol the usa can defend its air space...

Even if china managed to weaken our air defence they still do not have the logistical support to move enough troops fast enough from china to american soil to make an difference and what little they land will be killed fast in waves, if the lines fall then a scortched earth policy....

lets say china winning idk what 60,000,000 active/reserve troops been drafted for the war etc etc well lets be nice i guess and say 5-6 thousand can fit on a fully fitted troop transport (lol, the actuall number is smaller alot smaller) they will need around 12000 (10000 is it 6000 troops per a boat) troops transports to make the process a one time shot...12000 fully fitted troop transports would take so much resurces and time/effort that when they invade it would be a laugh...not to mention I wouldn't mind sitting on the shore and watching them be destroyed it would be like fireworks.

If they even manged to land that many people (or even half that many shit a quarter that many) then a scorched earth policy would be taken and supply lines would be hit hard and fast starving the enemy army out...chines biggest weakness is it vast numbers...a large army is easy to starve to death and extremly hard to resupply.

and no offense but do you really believe that the USA doesnt have the man power/over sized budget to buy enough and operate enough planes to protect it air space>? seriously?

In the end a war with china would turn into a "my penis is bigger contest" because neither side has the logistical support capabilities to actually move enough troops fast enough to make a successful landing..let alone enough to land secure then carry out a campaign.

and on a side note it extremly funny that you actually believe a video game could occur....lol im still laughing from reading that comment lol ah i need that laugh thank you.

and do you not rememebr world war2>? japan wasnt bigger back then at least...not before it butt ****ed china into submission and had it populace running in fear...why didn't their numbers save them then>? and that was with japan invading and conquering several other countries and with allied air support and british support...

scorpio


Only part i agree with you on is the fact the the worlds economy would go to shit as soon as war was declared and no one would have enough money to fight it....but I all ready said that twice before your post.

__________________

MarchoftheBlackLions

A land invasion would not be practical for China.

Our armed redneck population is plentiful.

__________________

XGrave

yes because USA has red necks in Canada too... jesus christ.... nukes are used as a levy not an actual weapon and stop quoting the art of war because even though some of it is useful its crap these days because we don't have the honor of lining up in bright colored uniforms waving giant flag poles at our enemy and going like omg we here her come to kill you... and nog stfu you have obviously failed to realize that chinese high schoolers don't get 40 hours of military service they don't get any at all and the gov't is not in TOTAL CONTROL its only in part of it right now
-------------
there's also the point as the first country to fire a nuke will get teamed up on... not necessarily true but will most likely will happen. We must consider the fact of appeasement... we fire a nuke at you but you won't fire back because you know that if you do you get screwed over because then you might end up starting world war III instead of solving stuff diplomatically (we don't go by shoot first ask questions later now)

Wicked315

Yep. If China was attacked or vice versa, United Kingdom would react. Korea will take advantage, France (Lol?), Germany, and of course..Russia.

Then all the third-world countries will be picking sides...it just wouldn't happen.

__________________

olaph

The Nuke threat is more verbal then anything.

No one is ever going to use them due to the MAD theory/law.

It just not worth using one knowing the outcome.

__________________

MarchoftheBlackLions

Duh.

They're in sleeper cells, obviously.

__________________

Maizen

Nogardreyals, PLEASE stop

__________________

endgam3r

"even though some of it is useful its crap these days?" yes... very contradicting ........well even though it is "useful" but is "crap" these days.. it is still studied and learned by top military officials. nowhere in the book does it say to line up your soldiers and charge in, who in their right mind would go to combat like that when both sides are using guns.... the art of war is about deceit and tactics.. which can be adapt to different levels of combat/situations. And I'm using those specific quotes to relate to how America's attitude is like. As evident from earlier posts.

__________________

Kenapachi

Well They sure as do out-number us.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of..._by_population
1,334,250,000
Next is India with 1,172,850,000
And last but not least is us. 307,981,000
I know this is Wikipedia and not a reliable source, but Those numbers look right.
If we did the math (I am not the best mathematician, and it's not hard i know but I'm rather dumb, Don't laugh if I'm doing it wrong.) Let's see how many Chinese we'd have to kill for every American.
1,334,250,000/307,981,000(I think?)
1 334 250 000 / 307 981 000 = 4.33224777
Every American would have to kill 4.3 Chinese People.
I don't think that is going to happen.
We probably do have better weaponry and Training though.
Either way though, It's about strategy. It's not about #'s or Nukes.
Seeing how we're never going to use nukes, I doubt any other country will either.
They know the effects and harm it can do.
It's also about allies.
I also doubt that they're going to send 1.3Billion Troops. They Won't send 300million either.
I also highly doubt that 300million people in the us are going to fight.
**** DON'T MAKE FUN OF ME.