|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
POPOPOPGOESTHEGLOCKGLOCK
|
And saying that the Space Administration will be focusing on terrestrial sciences.
![]() (To be fair, though, Obama did say he would do this in his campaign.) http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/...46,print.story |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |
|
POPOPOPGOESTHEGLOCKGLOCK
|
Quote:
NASA as an agency has done an amazing amount of advancement of technology. They've done so much for our understanding the universe and the world we live in it's stupid. Focusing on global warming? BS. There are plenty of government agencies researching that. NASA should do the stuff that NASA does best: space. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 8,400
Reputation: 292
|
Quote:
Although not sure about the human race. If we did survive we would have split of and evolved into seperate species by then. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |
|
POPOPOPGOESTHEGLOCKGLOCK
|
Quote:
How do you feel about microprocessors? Or... Hmm... You know, the satellites that let geologists research with precision the movement of the shifts of Earth plates? (I bet your geology teacher is pretty fond of that.) NASA does far more than just pick up space rocks and look at super novas. They've raised the bar technologically in so many ways it's almost impossible to calculate just exactly how much they have affected history. Although you can do an economic measurement: over the course of NASA's history, every one dollar the U.S. government funded NASA has ended up in seven to eight dollars produced in goods. That's an 700% return from technological research going directly into the economy. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|