|
|
#31 (permalink) |
|
Power_Gamer_6's Pick
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Smoothville
Posts: 2,447
Reputation: 232
|
Anyone else waiting for Ronin to pop in with a lengthy post stating why we are all wrong and Croatia would actually be the victor in a world conflict? (or something to that effect)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 (permalink) | |
|
Master Chief's Windex
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 82
Reputation: 10
|
Quote:
Its all about technology.(Modern Warfare) I guess you could say that china lacks technology. America could easily take out any army, with its airplanes, and weapons. The only reason we're so soft in Iraq is because it is in urban environments, with civilians, and scattered, small groups of enemies. Last edited by Cuddl3s; 04-03-2010 at 07:16 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 (permalink) |
|
Illgamez Insomniac
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Pallet Town
Posts: 2,227
Reputation: 56
|
Here is the problem with China & world domination:
People are terrified of the Chinese military because their numbers are so large. But the main issue about China and their definate failure for world domination is their technology. They are about +30 years behind the US & Britain. Every year, our technology is getting better while Chinas is deteriorating with time. Our weapons have better accuracy & stopping power, and the equipment we wear is getting better as time goes on. Sure, the technology they currently have like cellphones, etc, etc. is pretty good, but their military technology is inferior. Their numbers would drop 10x faster than ours if we went to war. China is still using old AK models from WW2 & ones that were used in the Korean War. The newest model is the AK-74. China can't afford it. Also our allies would be Canada, Great Britain, & France. I'm an American but I have to say Canadas infantry is top tier. They're really good. Last edited by KREVA; 04-03-2010 at 08:51 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#35 (permalink) | |
|
Dante’s Inferno
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 609
Reputation: 23
|
Quote:
Jesus. Go play some more mmos. This is the result. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 (permalink) | |
|
Power_Gamer_6's Pick
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Smoothville
Posts: 2,447
Reputation: 232
|
Quote:
Also, the AK-74 isn't technically the "newest model" and isn't particularly more expensive to produce than the 47. China stopped using their "older" AK variant in the 80's replacing it with the Type 81/87 and have since introduced the QBZ-95 along with their proprietary cartridges. However lacking you may find their military capability, to paint the picture that they're using worn out hand me downs would be misleading. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 (permalink) | |
|
Illgamez Insomniac
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Pallet Town
Posts: 2,227
Reputation: 56
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 (permalink) | |
|
`Doll's Dishwasher
|
Good luck taking over the world with old Soviet Tech.
__________________
![]() Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|