|
|
#11 (permalink) | |
|
Baby Bowsers Soiled Diaper
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 729
Reputation: 17
|
Quote:
If I seem someone with a tactical knife with marathon, lightweight and commando, I just leave the game. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
Marios's Mustache Wax
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Mexico
Posts: 13
Reputation: 12
|
like i said before i prefer modern warfare 2 but battlefield have lots of things which i like...........like its a game about teamwork and in bc2 u can destroy EVERYTHING
(Multiplayer)Now about the campaign i prefer a lot more bc2 cause u unlock your weapons and there are very interesting achievements
__________________
Do what you love and live with no regrets!
By: Leo Jordil |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
Link's a Hippie!
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 688
Reputation: 47
|
I really feel that BC2 encourages teamwork in ways that mw2 will never. I also enjoy being able to get in the game right away, without grinding for various perks and whatnot.
__________________
Back to school shopping breaking your spirit, Join Jackthreads "Prices so cheap, stella DEF. got her groove back" (50%-80% URBAN clothing - Invite Only)? Enter your email here. (Original Onrpg JackThreads Inviter) |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
Loric's Lunatic
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,638
Reputation: 66
|
I prefer BC2. Instead of one guy pwning everyone on the other team, it's one squad pwning the other team.
You at least you need a good squad until it's pure ownage. But on more serious reasons:1. much more balanced grenade launcher, you at least need to hit the guy to kill him, and not just any hit, it has to be dead on. While MW2 is just around the area and he's dead, no exceptions. 2. More than 18 players. I don't like being limited on enemies, especially on bigs maps like in MW2. If they have CoD4 sized maps, then it's okay, but with MW2, it's big maps and little amounts people. 3. Graphics. Even on the 360, it's graphics are outstanding. I have MW2 maxed out on the PC and I have to say it sucks. I've seen BC2 on the 360 and WOW it's better than MW2 maxed. 4. No OP perks. I mean wtf? Perks that allow a major difference in speed, no name over the player? Prone=pwnage as sniper. At least BC2 has much more balanced perks, not saying it's perfect, but it's balanced out. 5. Weapons are fairly spread out. Instead of guns that get powerful-er and powerful-er as you advance in rank, you get weapons for different uses through out your multiplayer experience. There are of course some guns that are balanced out in terms of effectiveness. Just my 2 cent. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) | |
|
`Doll's Dishwasher
|
There is no teamplay in MW2.
There is teamplay in BC2. Both are multiplayer FPS. BC2 wins.
__________________
![]() Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 (permalink) |
|
OnRPG Elite Member!
|
I used to really like MW2, like before I prestiged. The game just got really tedious to me and I got tired of the bullshit. The campaign is great but the multiplayer just turned gay. It requires no such skill.
BC2 requires at least some skill and team work. Everyone has a job, there are no killstreaks, and there is more satisfaction through kills. The campaign wasn't as great, but the multiplayer makes up for it. BC2 > MW2. |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 (permalink) |
|
Marios's Mustache Wax
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Mexico
Posts: 13
Reputation: 12
|
so................... the fact is mw2 has more errors but its more popular but bc2 has less errors which is better but less players
![]()
__________________
Do what you love and live with no regrets!
By: Leo Jordil |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|