Originally Posted by Norrin Radd

I didn't say that I did, stop being immature.

Am I right or wrong? If you were taught reading comprehension at a later age, you either have different schooling or you needed it. Over here, it's not something you learn beyond the younger years of primary school.



I suppose I just answered my above statement. You needed it.

Did you not read a word I said?

"Being longer and full of more text does not mean a thing on a content-based level.

I get more enjoyment out of an issue of Watchmen than I do out of The Da Vinci Code, for example.

Yet, I get more out of Ulysses than I do out of most comics. It depends on the content and the person reading it.".

Length and amount does not enter into it, what matters is what the content IS. Quality, not quantity. If I've truly reduced your pathetic argument down to "I'm arguing that books contain more text.", then way to go. I never argued that point. I argued that more text doesn't mean you get more out of the book objectively, and gave examples.

Do you have anything else to say to me?