Quote:
Originally Posted by Norrin Radd
Seeing as we're back to comics slightly, I'll indulge you.
Yes, and I'm going to take a man seriously who spelled my very simple name wrong, twice...as well as being a troll.
|
Oh my bad sir, are you from Harvard? Do I need to bow? oh wait, this is a ignore-valid-argument-because-you-spelled-my-name-wrong, counter? I've not seen anyone pull that off before, because mostly, people would call that a weak-sauce argument. I guess you don't deal with arguments unless i kiss and wipe your ***, While singing O'Canada. Answer the point. Norrin Radd. By the way, your name is probably the least thing I could give a damn about. Sorry to hit you with the reality-fest, but your NAME IS NOT IMPORTANT.
Quote:
|
If that's the case, then his argument still fails. Because everything expressed in comics is more than capable of conveying each and every one of those thematic or literary elements.
|
You know what? I wont slam you for this, I didn't make it clear that I'm with you on the comics, except the ABOVE paragraph. So I'll re-affirm it, I agree that comics can convey allll I've said above, but is it their purpose? no. Also, the argument had LITTLE to do with comics, it had to do with your complete feckerin' of "LOL WE DONT COMPREHEND ABOVE LOWER LVLS".
I see your way of debating = brush off then insult. Should we just hand out the medals? Or are you going to pretend to provide a decent rebuttal? damn.
Quote:
|
So depending on the comic AND the writer, AS I KEEP SAYING, they absolutely can do the same things as books.
|
Hell, Imagery and symbolism can be better conveyed with images. I'm with you there buddy. Stop detracting the argument. GOOD GOD.
Quote:
|
Dan Brown's probably read more books than you or I, failure.
|
Yep, it's clear you aren't the debating type, you probably don't even know it, but all you've done is misinterpret the point and then argue something completely unrelated. Where am I mentioning comics in those sentence? yes. it's a comic topic, and YES I do not fault you for assuming I'm with iMicros, but let's clear this up, my only beef with you is your complete lack of knowledge on
anything. INCLUDING THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE.
Quote:
|
Anna Kournikova has studied more tapes of tennis players than you or I, yet remains a failure.
|
NOW i know where you get all this flowery text, typing random, irrelevant crap. yay to you man. I can do that to? HEY HEY I COULD BE YOUR GIRLFFRIEND.
Isn't it nice to waste people's time? especially during a debate.
Quote:
|
better understanding of something does not mean better ability to use what you've learned. You can study guitar for 20 years, you may never be as good as Joe Satriani.
|
LOALDOADLAODLAODLADL
BETTER OF UNADKLAD:K OFAJFK WHAT THE HELL
ALD"ALDALD WTF? BETTER UNDERSTAND DOES NOT = BETTER USAGE? ARE YOU MAD? LOLADoALDOALD WHAT ARGUEMETN IS THIS? I CANT EVED TYPE PROPERLY THIS IS JUST ABSOLUTE IDIOCY. SO as you got older and understand the English language you didn't get better at writing? is that what you're saying me? Naturally knowledge improves everything, every-god-damn thing. Anything, there's no "well.." about it. Knowledge is INFACT, BY DEFINITION, MORE INFORMATION ABOUT TOPIC. I don't see how you can even bring up some weak sauce "No u" and then let that shit roll, why don't you spend more time buttering your arguments and less time with the tennis players, eh?
As for your "may nbevr be good as joe who-ever the face" this is easily refutable "YOU can study for 20 years and you can be better than him" you see how it's not cute to bring up stupid little examples using "may"? The possibilities of an individual has zero to do with Knowledge and application.
It's like me saying "I may lose my thumb tomorrow" it has no basis tot his argument, don't you may with me again, punk.
Quote:
Alike to this; reading many books does not guarantee you'll gain ANY ability to re-use it.
You fail.
|
Wow this is such piss poor defense. "you mite not be able to use what you learn"
Why? WHY? less you forget it, why can't you use what you learn?
Quote:
Let's not play dumb and say comics do not.
Have you ever read anything by Alan Moore? Grant Morrison? Neil Gaiman? Warren Ellis? If not, then keep quiet. If you have, then you'll understand why the above comment contains more crap than a constipated fat man.
|
Yay, seems we are playing dumb. Did I say they did not add to the comprehension, or did I state how little it is. Why don't you read things over, BUDDY. And the **** I should shut up if I don't know some of your wank artists, please.