Quote:
Originally Posted by brutzer
nah there are still artistic games being made
|
I didn't say there aren't any still beening made -.-
edit: also those 2 games you posted had low budget in the beginning anyway.
read these 2 post carefully:
http://www.onrpg.com/boards/146063.html#post2028961 (Blizzard games never get old)
http://www.onrpg.com/boards/146063.html#post2028969 (Blizzard games never get old)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calumet
GTFO Noob you are just a fanboy of shitty games who didnt realize that Blizzard are the gods of game programmers. these guys are awesome, when they make a game it is years the best of the genre until they make a new one in this genre.
now bow for them!!!
|
orly? I concur.
I have D1 & D2, WC2, WC3(with expansion), SC1(with expansion) and had played WoW for 1 month when it first came out and I no longer will touch that shit again. I have played those for years(not WoW), you need to learn to understand this topic first before trying to flame with me. This topic is how blizzard's new games never gets old because they make games that are not graphical?? but hey...D3 and SC2 are graphical with lots of physics.
Old experienced game companies making new games doesn't mean their next game will be awesome WITHOUT it beening graphically these days, alot of ppl hype the game, but sometimes it turns out to be fail.
I personally think OP hasn't play enough games between 2004-2007 release to understand most of my points...
oh and you TITS OR GTFO.