|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Banned
|
I made an oath some time ago to refuse to critique that particular stock. The Will Smith one. I got so pissed from seeing it all over the place. Doesn't look bad though.
The other two are great, but the second is better. I would like to see the original stock for them, though. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Lockhart’s are forever
Join Date: May 2006
Location: In your pocket
Posts: 386
Reputation: 10
|
Of course thats all you see. Thats all you ever see. You never appreciate the subtle effects I use, despite the fact that you preach the use of sublety. I'm wish you could look a little deeper, frankly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Banned
|
Wow. You kick my *** at manips. I suck at them. Good work, after seeing the stocks.
@Availer: in the second one, I don't think that's all brushes. Looks like he did some other effects - maybe some filters or perhaps a C4D - and erased/feathered what he wanted to show. I also see some scanlines. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |
|
Bladin's Sword Sharpener
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,181
Reputation: 13
|
Quote:
Anyway, they arnt photomanips, they are sigs, all you did was add effects. Photomanips are when.. someone manipulates something to look like something else. For example, A sandy beach into a universal beach, by adding planets etc. Last edited by availer; 03-18-2007 at 10:12 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Lockhart’s are forever
Join Date: May 2006
Location: In your pocket
Posts: 386
Reputation: 10
|
Yeah, ok, you keep telling yourself that. It is a photomanipulative sig. Geez.
I never flamed you. I spoke my mind, just like you do in every post. I really don't give a damn if you like my sigs, but when you say all I use is blur and brushing effects, you are dead wrong. You're not the all knowing powerful omnipresent god of sig design. You miss things, like everyone. So please, if you are going to critique, either make suggestions (which you are always telling people to do for you) or tell me if you like it or not. Don't needlessly comment on a sig's simplicity simply because you cannot deduce hidden effects in the sig. Good day. Last edited by ronen_fox; 03-18-2007 at 10:32 PM. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|