Soldier Front VS. Warrock Online - Page 8 - Free MMO & MMOFPS

fuyoh · 02-19-2008, 04:47 AM

i would like to play warrock but my country is not in the list

. and soldier front is really crap game

Kilo · 02-19-2008, 06:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fuyoh

i would like to play warrock but my country is not in the list

. and soldier front is really crap game

i think leveup games has a version of warrock out.. don't know what the site is though.

Necronax · 02-19-2008, 07:59 PM

apperentley Warrock got rid of the massive lag I may be trying it out soon

by lag I mean people with craptastic connections

Kn7ghT · 02-19-2008, 08:09 PM

They both suck
But id say Warrok since it isn't as pathetic as sf.

shinatoma · 02-21-2008, 02:24 PM

i hve played both games recently and i have to say WarrocK:
-Barely any hackers
- some noobs still lag
- every one wants money to get the new guns so they never kick you out
-new guns
-new maps
- easy to start learning
- they added more recoil to the guns so if you spray no bullets will hit
- some new vehicals
and more but im to lazy to type them all out

carbonhyperion · 02-22-2008, 03:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wwenbo

soldier front sucks, warrock ftw. You can't even run right in sf, it always seems like you're sliding on the floor.

that the gay part ist it? wel yes u do slide... whice is ****ed up

stanace · 02-22-2008, 05:41 AM

Soldier Front was pathetic. The game fails to deliver on all fronts. It doesn't feel like a shooter, it doesn't look like a shooter. You have no idea how disappointed I was when I tried it a few years back.
Warrock on the other hand, while it mimicks Battlefield, is actually pretty good. While it could use a bit more balancing so that soldiers aren't completely useless on a map with vehicles, the vehicles are mostly pretty well done. Flying the bombers and helicopters was a blast, especially when you're skilled at doing so.

I'm not so sure about lag though, since I played on the Korean version. Korea's fibre is so uber that I can get lower ping connecting to them than I can to the States.

spreex · 02-23-2008, 04:29 AM

why the heck is this thread even here..the answer is so clear..WARROCK will 120% own sf....sadly i cant play war cause my country isnt in the list anymore..fk it..

carbonhyperion · 02-23-2008, 05:18 AM

eh seriously

SF like wtf 10 ppl in a room?
Warrock 30+ ppl in a room.....

warrock big battle field
sf small *** map

warrock vehicle+load of wep+class
sf SUCK

ok basicly SF SUCK HELLA ALOT!

Warrock Pwn!

and u dont lag if u got good PC

not good as long as it reach requirerment it good enought to play without lag

cheezydonutz2 · 07-04-2008, 04:05 AM

well Warrock has a lot of hackers too today almost every room i went in has a hacker
Right now ijji has patched most of all the hacks and like 10% i see a hacker
MOST weapons in warrock are for prem members,go ahead spend money on a worthless game
in SF just rank up etc and get SP and buy guns and their unlimited
the only reason SF lags is becuz u guys got maybe shitty computers
My friends computer has only a raedon x300 or something like that and he can run it fine
and so what is SF doesnt have blood go search it only too see how to set it on
Warrock makes all the bad guns good
and the good ones bad
for example
k1 and k2 are base on accuracy not speed
and when i fight some1 with a k1
the k1 has the speed of like a FA-MAS
the sniping system sucks in Warrock too
imagine in real life if i shot someone in the heart with a sniper
and they still lived
that doesnt make sense
its takes 2 shots with sniper too kill them in the upper body
no sense
so what if graphics arent good
judge on the gameplay
SF takes alot more skill if you fought the Koreans
i think the other versions of sf has over 20 guns to pick from
its easier to rank up too
i get so many kills in Warrock and get 10 less deaths and only get like 3 percent
thats BS
soldier front also has armour to buy from
they have actual forces that you can pick from
It doesnt matter if its an imatatine
what if your a person who cant efford that stuff
stop being so whiny its free
and whoever though of making a smoke nade a prem member item
I know soldier front doesnt have any wehicles but it just ruins the fun
the maps arent as big as Warrock and mostly nubs use vehicles becuz of their high power
i'm asking in Warrock why would a nade leave a red trail?????
i agree that soldeir front is more friendly becuz ppl only want to kick afk ppl
soldier front looks kinda great if your graphics card was good
in warrock every gun has the same scope WTF
each gun should have their own custom scope
and heavy weapons
1 shot with a rocket directly at some guy and it doesnt kill him
even up really really close??????///
thats horesht
ARENT SNIPERS SUPPOSE TO CAMP???????
think in real life would a sniper run up into the open vs like 3 guys and manage to kill all of them?????
i dont really care if you cant run in sf just right them a letter or something
the maps are soooooooo big so if there was a running system ppl would be dropping dead fast
using the boxes is called strategic covering so u dont get caught easily and DIE
in Warrock why would u use your fists??
is it was melee SF vs Warrock sf would win cuz they have KNIVES
so iprefer SF over Warrock
my friends think thats SF is funny
GRAPHICS ARENT EVRTHING UR STUPID TO JUDGE ON GRAPHICS like i said alrdy
who defuses bombs with a wrench??
using a knife makes more sense
to cut the wires DUH
i know SF nading system doesnt make sense
when u hold a nade in ur hand once u pulled the trigger for a long time
soldeir front now is clearly adding more weapons characters armours maps
and trying to improve the game
they;re trying their best
IF U GUYS ARE KOREAN AND WANT A REAL GOOD FPS GAME try AVA
i saw some videos and it looks so kick ***
and yeah so i prefer sf over warrock
u guys probably suck at the game they now have a training system jeez lol

02-19-2008, 07:59 PM	#73 (permalink)
Necronax Loric's Lunatic Join Date: May 2006 Location: New Jersey, USA Posts: 2,057	apperentley Warrock got rid of the massive lag I may be trying it out soon by lag I mean people with craptastic connections __________________ On OnRPG to win attention you must 1. Have a half naked cartoon or Asian chick in your avatar or signature 2. To post senselessly until your fingers hurt and hope to God someone takes acknowledgment of you 3. Start a flame war and get the majority to hate you without getting banned

02-19-2008, 08:09 PM	#74 (permalink)
Kn7ghT Olpah's Object Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Soviet Union Posts: 2,124	They both suck But id say Warrok since it isn't as pathetic as sf. __________________ **** you gw, you beat gmod

02-23-2008, 04:29 AM	#78 (permalink)
spreex Luigi’s Pizza Join Date: Oct 2006 Posts: 136	why the heck is this thread even here..the answer is so clear..WARROCK will 120% own sf....sadly i cant play war cause my country isnt in the list anymore..fk it.. __________________ Lets save this world by first saving our endangered species

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

02-19-2008, 04:47 AM	#71 (permalink)
fuyoh Marios's Mustache Wax Join Date: Nov 2007 Posts: 9	i would like to play warrock but my country is not in the list . and soldier front is really crap game

02-22-2008, 05:41 AM	#77 (permalink)
stanace Master Chief's Windex Join Date: Dec 2006 Posts: 82	Soldier Front was pathetic. The game fails to deliver on all fronts. It doesn't feel like a shooter, it doesn't look like a shooter. You have no idea how disappointed I was when I tried it a few years back. Warrock on the other hand, while it mimicks Battlefield, is actually pretty good. While it could use a bit more balancing so that soldiers aren't completely useless on a map with vehicles, the vehicles are mostly pretty well done. Flying the bombers and helicopters was a blast, especially when you're skilled at doing so. I'm not so sure about lag though, since I played on the Korean version. Korea's fibre is so uber that I can get lower ping connecting to them than I can to the States.

02-23-2008, 05:18 AM	#79 (permalink)
carbonhyperion Banned Join Date: Jan 2008 Posts: 249	eh seriously SF like wtf 10 ppl in a room? Warrock 30+ ppl in a room..... warrock big battle field sf small *** map warrock vehicle+load of wep+class sf SUCK ok basicly SF SUCK HELLA ALOT! Warrock Pwn! and u dont lag if u got good PC not good as long as it reach requirerment it good enought to play without lag

07-04-2008, 04:05 AM	#80 (permalink)
cheezydonutz2 Marios's Mustache Wax Join Date: Jul 2008 Posts: 3	well Warrock has a lot of hackers too today almost every room i went in has a hacker Right now ijji has patched most of all the hacks and like 10% i see a hacker MOST weapons in warrock are for prem members,go ahead spend money on a worthless game in SF just rank up etc and get SP and buy guns and their unlimited the only reason SF lags is becuz u guys got maybe shitty computers My friends computer has only a raedon x300 or something like that and he can run it fine and so what is SF doesnt have blood go search it only too see how to set it on Warrock makes all the bad guns good and the good ones bad for example k1 and k2 are base on accuracy not speed and when i fight some1 with a k1 the k1 has the speed of like a FA-MAS the sniping system sucks in Warrock too imagine in real life if i shot someone in the heart with a sniper and they still lived that doesnt make sense its takes 2 shots with sniper too kill them in the upper body no sense so what if graphics arent good judge on the gameplay SF takes alot more skill if you fought the Koreans i think the other versions of sf has over 20 guns to pick from its easier to rank up too i get so many kills in Warrock and get 10 less deaths and only get like 3 percent thats BS soldier front also has armour to buy from they have actual forces that you can pick from It doesnt matter if its an imatatine what if your a person who cant efford that stuff stop being so whiny its free and whoever though of making a smoke nade a prem member item I know soldier front doesnt have any wehicles but it just ruins the fun the maps arent as big as Warrock and mostly nubs use vehicles becuz of their high power i'm asking in Warrock why would a nade leave a red trail????? i agree that soldeir front is more friendly becuz ppl only want to kick afk ppl soldier front looks kinda great if your graphics card was good in warrock every gun has the same scope WTF each gun should have their own custom scope and heavy weapons 1 shot with a rocket directly at some guy and it doesnt kill him even up really really close??????/// thats horesht ARENT SNIPERS SUPPOSE TO CAMP??????? think in real life would a sniper run up into the open vs like 3 guys and manage to kill all of them????? i dont really care if you cant run in sf just right them a letter or something the maps are soooooooo big so if there was a running system ppl would be dropping dead fast using the boxes is called strategic covering so u dont get caught easily and DIE in Warrock why would u use your fists?? is it was melee SF vs Warrock sf would win cuz they have KNIVES so iprefer SF over Warrock my friends think thats SF is funny GRAPHICS ARENT EVRTHING UR STUPID TO JUDGE ON GRAPHICS like i said alrdy who defuses bombs with a wrench?? using a knife makes more sense to cut the wires DUH i know SF nading system doesnt make sense when u hold a nade in ur hand once u pulled the trigger for a long time soldeir front now is clearly adding more weapons characters armours maps and trying to improve the game they;re trying their best IF U GUYS ARE KOREAN AND WANT A REAL GOOD FPS GAME try AVA i saw some videos and it looks so kick *** and yeah so i prefer sf over warrock u guys probably suck at the game they now have a training system jeez lol