The quality I am talking about is making new games, instead of sequels that will hold many similarities to that of the PS2 games, jftr.
The xbox 360 is not selling all that well.
Quote:
|
And a game can be good whether it has good quality or not. Look at the old SNES games, they had pretty bad graphics and yet I still think they're good. Graphics is one of the main things people look for in quality.
|
Pretty sure I've explained before that graphics do not equal quality.
Quote:
|
Along with the Storyline, Creativity, and many other things.
|
These are required for quality games.
Quote:
|
The quality of the game does not determine if it is good or not. Good to a person just means if they like the game.
|
I am talking about the quality of the game, not the enjoyability it has to a small majority of the people it was aimed towards.
Quote:
|
Just because a game has a bad storyline or horrible graphics doesn't mean it's not good to someone.
|
I am not disagreeing with this. Still, I am talking about quality.
Quote:
|
So the quality of a game is not it's determining factor in the likeness of the game.
|
Sure, but this still isn't what I'm talking about.
Quote:
|
Look at Viewtiful Joe. I personally thought the game was horrible. Bad graphics, not an immersive storyline, and a lot more wrong with that game, but a lot of people out there liked the game. That's their opinion and I respect that, but my opinion is that it completely sucked.
|
I do not like Final Fantasy because I feel it lacks in the RPG department (it is hardly an rpg at all, imo), but it still has quality in other departments (storyline, gameplay). My opinion does not mean it sucks, because for the most part final fantasy doesn't suck.
My point is, opinion =/= quality.