|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
Moderator
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 5,064
Reputation: 253
|
I use TuneUp too, and I also get that message as I have a 64bit processor. It doesn't mean you should upgrade though, you're not losing or missing anything with your current 32bit operating system. Your processor isn't being bottlenecked by anything and is doing what it's supposed to be doing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) | ||
|
Missing No.
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Not here
Posts: 4,711
Reputation: 39
|
This one line doesn't make a lick of sense...
__________________
**I am no longer an active staff member. Please do not send me a message asking for any help on the site, it will not be read**
Quote:
Quote:
LOL BUTTS This is FabianN, signing off at 01-28-2009 Good luck on the tubes. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
ಠ_ಠ
|
Hehe... no it didn't. Thats because I don't think that guy knows what he is talking about.
Ok now to get down and dirty. Comparing 64-bit and 32-bit windows. YAY! Not... Windows 64-Bit was a rushed out POS that windows shoved on the market as thier first real venture into the 64-bit world. And it sucked. Major incompatbility issues, and it is less efficient than its 32-bit counterpart. Most benchmarks at the moment show now MAJOR speed increase going from 32-bit ro 64-bit... why? Because right now about 95% of developers are creating programs in a 32-bit architecture. This is because the majority of the US still uses Windows XP or Vista 32-bit at the moment. Now the reason I switched over to the 64-bit version of Windows Vista was mainly for RAM. The limitation of the 32-bit architecture is that it can only detect up to 3GB of RAM, give or take. So I got screwed here with my 4GB since Windows XP would never take full advantage. At that point I had three options: 1) Stick with XP and just work with 3GB 2) Upgrade to XP 64-bit 3) Upgrade to Vista 64-bit Now the 2nd option was just plain out of the question. With the third option, well I wanted to get what I paid for. I wanted to be able to use all my 4GB's of RAM so I decided at that point it was time to switch. Conclusion!? Ok... If you have no issues at all with your computer. Your memory is low enough for it all to be used, and everything is squeaky clean... than stick with your current set-up. There is no need to make a leap into a 64-bit world YET! Now if you have the NEED to upgrade... DON'T go with XP 64-Bit. I would suggest looking into Vista at that point. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) | |
|
Marios's Mustache Wax
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 18
Reputation: 10
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) | |
|
ಠ_ಠ
|
Quote:
And next time dont be a prude about it.... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 (permalink) | ||
|
Missing No.
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Not here
Posts: 4,711
Reputation: 39
|
Stick with XP Pro. You have no need for 64 bit OS right now.
__________________
**I am no longer an active staff member. Please do not send me a message asking for any help on the site, it will not be read**
Quote:
Quote:
LOL BUTTS This is FabianN, signing off at 01-28-2009 Good luck on the tubes. |
||
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|