|
|
#22 (permalink) |
|
OnRPG Elite Member!
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Hitman Victor
Posts: 4,923
Reputation: 302
|
It just doesnt say if it uses the free version of Avast/AVG in the test, the same goes for any other scanner, which mostly have a trial/free/home/buissnes/coorporate eddition that are all diffrent in their features.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 (permalink) | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,884
Reputation: 221
|
Quote:
Not worth the money in my opinion. All of those things you could do through seperate free software, software which is probably better at the job too. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 (permalink) | |
|
Norrin Radd's Nerd Rage
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,662
Reputation: 34
|
Quote:
Take for instance Norton/Symantec home vs corporate. I wouldn't even install the home/personal edition of a Norton product, but the corporate version seems to function at a much better level and scores very high on any comparison tests that I have read. Anywho, McAffee has always been garbage as far as I am concerned. AVG and Avast are both good free products though. Maybe I will try Avast again since it's been a while. NOD32 is the best pay av though. Kaspersky is decent as well, although heavier on the resources than NOD. hehe |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|