gyrobot

BF has armor owning you with the occasional lag

WR has a better armor balance and Aircraft isnt so dominating (Played in operation Engrene and managed to shoot down aircraft with an AA gun (and its mobile variant :eek: ). But it at times unrealistic (An Humvee with an MG can damage a battletank?)

GhostUnit

Warrock - faster ... pretty graphic fun.. lvlin etc


BF2 - soo buggy and glitchy...... lags a bit too when i have a good card.
cant play smooth got a 7600GS . overclocked.




so i say BF2 is better cuz is EA.... they big company....

__________________

*Legend*

Um, you mixed those two up there. xD

warrock (no respect for it, therefor the letters aren't capsed) - is horrible. Unrealistic damage, Bad...scratch that, HORRIBLE graphics, horrible controls, and a very noob unfriendly environment. Adding levels to a tactical FPS makes it hard on beginners because of the fact tat it's harder to kill, but easier to get killed. When a person levels their HP and SP are upped, meaning more bullets taken, and more rolls. This makes it hard for people to land a hit or do damage. You literally have to team up 3 new people just to take one person down. I've seen that happen. LAG, lag is the keyword! The game lags like my Aunt Pearls bloomers (I don't really have an aunt pearl) and vehicle battle makes it worse. Not to mention missions are unclearly explained and the game is very buggy.

BattleField 2 (plenty of repect for it, therefor the letters are capsed) - Realistic damage, way easier to get into, awesome graphics, awesome controls, and lagless. Vehicles are seemless and the controls for them are top ace.

In all truth, comparing warrock to BF2 is like comparing 29 cent Spam to a Sirloin Steak.

__________________

acessxz

LOL BF2 is much better , you cant compare these 2 together.

__________________

Dreakon

HORRIBLE graphics
Heh, I've seen MUCH worse. You, my friend, are spoiled if you consider this horrible, and for a free game no less.

horrible controls
I really don't see how. They seem pretty much the same as any vehiclular warfare FPS, and I've played pretty much all of them... including BF2. And if you mean the fact you can't remap the controls, that's on its way.

a very noob unfriendly environment
It's not that bad, and its not that much worse then other games. And it's free, what do you want? Geez...

Adding levels to a tactical FPS makes it hard on beginners because of the fact tat it's harder to kill, but easier to get killed. When a person levels their HP and SP are upped, meaning more bullets taken, and more rolls. This makes it hard for people to land a hit or do damage. You literally have to team up 3 new people just to take one person down. I've seen that happen.
The levels do nothing for you, other then a simple ranking system. No one is made stronger by the levels. What your looking for is the item shop, and the advantage of a different gun isn't that great.

IF (and its a pretty big if, since I doubt you know for sure, nor do I) you do get more HP and SP per level, the increase is insignificant. I have easily taking down higher ranks then myself, alone, which I pretty much had to since I don't play enough to be a high rank.

Yeah, people do tend to go 3 on 1 in games like this. It doesn't mean they needed all 3 people to take the 1 person down. And if they're "new", then they probably just suck to begin with.

LAG, lag is the keyword! The game lags like my Aunt Pearls bloomers (I don't really have an aunt pearl) and vehicle battle makes it worse.
Lag is bad, I can agree with that. But more servers are going up every couple of weeks, and more will continue to go up. Go to the one closest to you and hopefully it'll be okay.

If you mean computer lag, then I can do nothing but laugh at you cause my crappy PC could run it fine.

Not to mention missions are unclearly explained and the game is very buggy.
Yeah, cause everyone focuses very clearly on the point of the missions. That must've just ruined the game for you. Oh, I feel soooo bad.

As for being buggy? What's buggy exactly? When I used to play, it worked fine. Odds are you don't know of any bugs that aren't your own fault, and your just calling it buggy because you needed something to close on...

Not only that, but once again, ITS FREE. Plus it's in beta. What do you expect?

BattleField 2 (plenty of repect for it, therefor the letters are capsed) - Realistic damage, way easier to get into, awesome graphics, awesome controls, and lagless. Vehicles are seemless and the controls for them are top ace.
Your not biased at all, are you?

*Legend*

Not trying to get into an arguement with you, but being free has nothing to do with how bad the game is made. Wolfenstein is leagues ahead of this game and it's also free, so I have no idea how it being free has to do with anything. And considering that the maximum requirements are so high, graphics should be atleast a bit better than what they have. Also are you certain you're not experienceing lag at all? Because that's a god damn lie. If your computer is as bad as you make it out to be, then you should lag out the ass with all the people connected in one room, the size of the 3D models in the game, the size of the maps and the distance (and technical specs) of the servers. And indeed, it's very buggy, when you type hotkeys are triggered, causing things like unwanted jumping and the opening of menus, if you don't find a place to hide, you'll be killed. Then there is the "phantom bug" where everyone on one team will have died at the same time except for one person, and force the mission to drag on. And let's not forget the Virtual Memory bug. It doesn't matter if it's in Beta, there are plenty of games in Beta put together alot better than this game. And yes, I'm biased, I'm biased because I'm telling the truth about something. Wow, I guess I'm also the biggest hypocrit in the world for telling my sister not to drink milk. The game is bad, bluntly put. Compared to BF2 it's not even worth being considered an FPS....or even an S for that matter. It's only something someone would play if they were blind, deaf, mute, and stupid, or bored out of their god forsaken mind. Or if they don't have money to buy a P2P game, or is tired of WS.

__________________

GhostUnit

I know BF2 has better graphic , fun , Rank.

bah.. they same... but BF2 betteR by alot.

Warrock is fuN tHo but LAGG


I want to play Warrock but way lag.. after i reinstall.

__________________

covert_eskimo

Well you cant expect to compare a free game to a p2p game from a big company like EA. I have both games and Warrock is exactly what I expected: A graphically and gameplayability lowered version of BF2. (not sure if gameplayability is even a word...) This is an unfair arguement, it would be like comparing WoW to runescape. (runescape wins duh...I cant even lie about that one...RUNESCAPE SUCKS) which would be...no contest. So find another free BF2 ripoff and compare warrock to that and you will have a fair arguement. Oh and Warrocks lvl system is like americas army's honor system. Doesnt do a damn thing for you.

__________________

2Dum2Lern

I think BF2 would be better.
Sadly I can't play it because I am missing 1 of the requirements..

__________________

Aeramil

Eh.. just thought I'd confirm that this statement is totally wrong - Levels give you absolutely no advantage in the game as of now, it may be different in the official release of the game, but from what I've heard it will probably be more in the way of being able to buy/use new guns at higher ranks. Anybody should still be able to own a much higher level if they have some skill.