PDA

View Full Version : N3 ~ Ninety Nine Nights = FAIL


*Legend*
01-01-2007, 11:30 PM
Ninety-Nine Nights puts a lot of enemies onscreen but doesn't give you many interesting ways to dispose of them.

The Good: Puts a lot of enemies onscreen.
The Bad: Basic attacks work better than the flashier combos; lame english voice acting with no apparent alternative soundtrack; combat is very repetitive.
----------------------------------------

Ninety-Nine Nights attempts to mine the same ground that games like Koei's Dynasty Warriors and Phantagram's Kingdom Under Fire have covered in the past, but it does so with only a bare minimum of strategy. While you still have limited control over other troops, this game is all about running into a crowd of hundreds of enemies and slamming on the two attack buttons until everyone is dead. While those attack buttons produce some flashy combos, Ninety-Nine Nights is a very shallow game that gets old fast.


The combo system lets you pull off some flashy stuff, but the basic attacks are more effective.

Ninety-Nine Nights tells the tale of a war between humans and foul creatures, such as goblins and frogmen. But it doesn't necessarily tell its story as one epic event. Instead, you're given the same story from multiple perspectives. You start out with only one character available, the 17-year-old Inphyy. Her story is one of vengeance, as she sets out with her army to destroy the goblins responsible for killing her father. You'll also play as Inphyy's older brother, Aspharr, and a mercenary named Myifee, as well as a few others. Each of the game's seven characters offers varying takes on events from both sides of the conflict, but a handful of missions flow through the same basic areas. So by playing through with every character, you'll notice a fair amount of repetition. Also, the campaigns of Inphyy and Aspharr are definitely the cornerstones of the game. Many of the other characters' stories are significantly shorter, though even the longer ones are only around six missions. Regardless, none of the characters have particularly compelling stories to tell, and the game's annoying English voice acting doesn't do a good job of conveying what little story there is.

Though a couple of the unlockable characters play differently, the bulk of the action in the game is painfully straightforward. You have two attack buttons, a dash maneuver, and the ability to jump or block. Hammering on the X and Y buttons will bust out combos that send the swarming hordes of enemies flying, and clearing a space around your character is usually easy, keeping you relatively safe from most damage. The characters gain experience and level up as you play, and each level brings longer, flashier combos. But the longer combos are usually a bit more canned, which can often leave your back open to attack. As a result, the shorter, four-hit combos take priority. Kills earn you red orbs that charge up a super-attack meter. Enemies killed while you're in your super-attack mode give up blue orbs, which charge up another meter that can be used for a devastating screen-clearing attack. Each character has different combos, timing, weapons, and super attacks, but the process of picking a short, simple combo and doing it over and over again doesn't change much.

In addition to leveling up your character, you'll find items around the battlefield that can be equipped. You'll find new, more powerful weapons, but they're just stronger versions of your existing weapon. They'll look a bit different in your character's hands, but they don't grant new combo attacks or change the gameplay in any way. You'll also find items that can boost your hit points, attack range, and defensive ability, among other attributes.

Though you're the most effective fighter on the battlefield, you'll also be given control of two groups of soldiers in most missions. Prior to entering a level, you can choose which soldiers you'd like to bring, like swordsman, archers, and so on. Your control over these soldiers is pretty limited, but it does what it needs to do. You can tell them to attack or hold back, as well as dismiss them altogether, causing them to stand back while you do the fighting. Your troops often seem completely useless and rarely seem to kill enemies. But they're usually good at engaging the enemy, which frees you up to run around behind enemies and take them out. Either way, their presence seems designed to make the battles look and feel larger, which works.

Graphically, the game is built around putting tons of characters onscreen at one time. You'll see hordes of goblins come swarming over a hill in your direction, and it's initially impressive, but when the hordes grow too large, the game does slow down quite a bit. While it gets sheer numbers right, the game uses an ugly blur effect on far-away enemies that looks less like a distance blur and more like you're seeing double. Plus, as you might expect, the hordes of enemies all look alike. You'll encounter a handful of different enemies as you play, but there isn't enough variety. The boss characters you encounter do, at least, look a little different and use different, more interesting-looking attacks.

The first couple of characters you play have the lengthiest campaigns. The rest feel sort of tacked on.

Individual campaigns won't take much time to finish, and if you run into trouble with any one mission, you can always go back to the previous one and kill more enemies until you gain a level and become more powerful, making everything a bit easier. The game does become time consuming, however, if you want to get all of its achievement points. You'll earn points for completing each character's storyline, and there are additional points to be had for getting all the characters up to level nine and finishing all of the missions with at least an A ranking.

On paper, the multiple characters and item collection might make Ninety-Nine Nights sound like a reasonably deep action game. Unfortunately, the action starts out completely mindless and wears even thinner as time goes on. Whether you're a fan of the let's-see-how-many-guys-we-can-cram-onscreen genre or not, this one's probably not worth your time.

Score
5.9/10

mediocre



Source: GameSpot (http://www.gamespot.com/xbox360/action/ninetyninenights/review.html)

Geistlich
01-01-2007, 11:49 PM
Your point?

Herbal
01-01-2007, 11:52 PM
i also fail to see the point in this

Kite
01-02-2007, 12:01 AM
there is a single player games section....

*Legend*
01-02-2007, 12:06 AM
Wow. Lol. Sorry. Must have had the wrong tab opened. Mods, you know the drill. =/

Also, Geistlich, herbal, if you fail to see the point in this, then why did you post?
Don't make yourselves look like idiots by posting trash like that again. I got the
review for people interested in the game, but confused as to if they should get it.

Raiyne
01-02-2007, 12:09 AM
Posting in wrong section = Fail!

Sorry had to do it. :D

Herbal
01-02-2007, 12:11 AM
Wow. Lol. Sorry. Must have had the wrong tab opened. Mods, you know the drill. =/

Also, Geistlich, herbal, if you fail to see the point in this, then why did you post?
Don't make yourselves look like idiots by posting trash like that again. I got the
review for people interested in the game, but confused as to if they should get it.

anyone can go to gamespot and read the review of the game if theyre interested in it

*Legend*
01-02-2007, 12:25 AM
anyone can go to gamespot and read the review of the game if theyre interested in it

That is not the matter at hand, here. The matter is that you post saying you see no point in it. If it isn't constructive, or if it doesn't pertain to the topic then there is no reason why you should have posted. If you find it useless then you should have let it died instead of joining in on the spamfest.

Raiyne, if you can, please move the topic. No topic shadowing please (means not to leave a copy that links over to the moved topic). =/

Herbal
01-02-2007, 12:27 AM
all you did is copy/paste a random review from gamespot...its pointless and contributes nothing original

Hotaznrice
01-02-2007, 12:35 AM
Stop argueing guys we are all cool homes here why wont we act like it he/she might just wanted to help people and I didnt even know that there was a game like this thx alot.....

kizaharu
01-02-2007, 12:41 AM
Its pretty hilarious your calling these guys idiots even though you posted a review for a single player game in the free mmo section...honestly dont be mad at them because you dont look at the forum before you post shees...take your anger out in a more productive manner. They didint see the point because you put a review for some game in the mmo section. People assumed it was an mmo yet you gave no links to anything productive. Pay attention to the forums next time smart guy. Yeah makes TONS of sense to call people idiots after doing something idiotic yourself doesent it?

Cereal&Milk
01-02-2007, 12:51 AM
Its pretty hilarious your calling these guys idiots even though you posted a review for a single player game in the free mmo section...honestly dont be mad at them because you dont look at the forum before you post shees...take your anger out in a more productive manner. They didint see the point because you put a review for some game in the mmo section. People assumed it was an mmo yet you gave no links to anything productive. Pay attention to the forums next time smart guy. Yeah makes TONS of sense to call people idiots after doing something idiotic yourself doesent it?

Hey, lol. Made a new account. But if you'd have read everything closely, says I had the wrong tab open, I don't know if you're a magical elf that can see all the information off screen, but at the time I could not see the information in the UCP bar. The matter is, if you don't see the point, don't post. Let it die. Next thing, everyone knows N3 is not an MMO therefore they would not assume anything, neither is it an RPG, therefore it does not belong in that section to begin with. Really man, if you're going to call someone smart guy and be sarcastic about it in a rude manner, make sure you're pretty smart yourself.

But I'll be the big man and apologize for my wrongs. As for contributing, seems like all the members that really did contribute to the website are gone (save for the few leftover from the ol' school OnRPG). So I try to help by pulling out a review for those that are too lazy to search, or did not look yet.

clragon
01-02-2007, 12:59 AM
eh? why did you create a new account?

shadow__6
01-02-2007, 01:04 AM
Give it up guys, you will not gain anything from winning a flame battle on the internet. His just trying to help out the community geez and he admit he posted in the wrong section already.

Cereal&Milk
01-02-2007, 01:08 AM
Felt like it.
I like the vibe to Milk&Cereal a lot better though. :)
Thanks for the backup shadow. =/

qewlkid9
01-02-2007, 02:04 AM
i liked the game....so stfu!

TrayDay
01-02-2007, 03:25 AM
Yes, a little discussion about a some what of been RPG. I knew way back when this game was going to hit for the next-gen console that it wasn't going to be too good. But I honestly didn't know it would be this bad I thought maybe a 7 or even an 8 would do. but what do I know, I haven't played it nor did I even thought about getting it. Just I knew it was an rpg which another reason X360 so I totally forgot about it to say as well. Anyways, Legend knew, corrected his mistake and well that's that. Milk and Cereal is a nice tune I agree. say that three times fast.

Chrono
01-02-2007, 03:32 AM
Moved to Single-Player section. :/

SorenEmblem
01-02-2007, 02:44 PM
I think that was a great review! :D I was thinking of renting it before playing it though. I might still try it. What system is it for again? I forget. XO

My Score on the review: 10/10 XD