View Full Version : chinas srength
crazy legs
07-06-2006, 10:23 AM
im all for fun and games n all but chinas new found srength and tec is flaming me. now theyve invented a new missle that is capable of not only hiting the usa but also able to carry nuclear warheads and we all know that china still has some necleur material left even though theyve said theyve cleand up. what i think is that theyr going to try sonthing really stupid and guess what, another war...... what do you think.:confused:
PowerGamer
07-06-2006, 10:42 AM
Actually their missles arent working yet, it failed over 200 miles far from the us, but the goverment doesnt know if the missle WAS launched at the us at all.
harikiri
07-06-2006, 10:43 AM
war war war, i hate war
Stop makeing stupid fucking posts like this no gives a fuck any its all gonna end up in Total flameing. And this shit is in the wrong section it should go in Martial Heroes section where noone fucking go's and noone will see it EVER lmfao
Raiyne
07-06-2006, 11:29 AM
I thought it was Korea with the nukes? o__O
DarkSide25
07-06-2006, 12:14 PM
im all for fun and games n all but chinas new found srength and tec is flaming me. now theyve invented a new missle that is capable of not only hiting the usa but also able to carry nuclear warheads and we all know that china still has some necleur material left even though theyve said theyve cleand up. what i think is that theyr going to try sonthing really stupid and guess what, another war...... what do you think.:confused:
And I am so going to smoke you for blaming China.
Its N. Korea.. Get your facts right.
Raiyne
07-06-2006, 12:55 PM
Owned.. i knew it. :D
kfckaykay
07-06-2006, 01:17 PM
Dang, Well.. If its gonna go war, I will hate it, Koreans have good decent mmorpg..
Rage On Dreams
07-06-2006, 01:33 PM
Stop makeing stupid fucking posts like this no gives a fuck any its all gonna end up in Total flameing. And this shit is in the wrong section it should go in Martial Heroes section where noone fucking go's and noone will see it EVER lmfao
The only one flaming is you. Maybe you calm your nuts a bit?
Dang, Well.. If its gonna go war, I will hate it, Koreans have good decent mmorpg..
Korean mmorpgs are from south korea, not North korea.
kfckaykay
07-06-2006, 01:52 PM
Oh, I did'nt know that, Ok then.. I LOVE IT!! WAR WAR WAR!! ITS GONNA BE FUN!!.. w/e.
Rage On Dreams
07-06-2006, 02:17 PM
Oh, I did'nt know that, Ok then.. I LOVE IT!! WAR WAR WAR!! ITS GONNA BE FUN!!.. w/e.
lolllll...
hotyman
07-06-2006, 02:18 PM
meh.. war war war.. whats it with the US.. why are all countrys targetting the US O.o..
when america finds them shooting missles.. Mr. Bush would send hes army..
Rage On Dreams
07-06-2006, 02:20 PM
Because U.S. is pretending to be king of the world and make all kind of rules everywhere. Like you cannot make weapon ( but we can) no nuclear weapon allowd ( we have a lot )...U.S. is kinda controlling the world indirecly in military power ( which means everytihng since power brings everything..) Not many country likes U.S. only such as ( forgot if it's france or englnd..either one ) will support them becuz they hope to get goodies from U.S....
hotyman
07-06-2006, 02:29 PM
Cough.. Holland
Raiyne
07-06-2006, 03:04 PM
Because U.S. is pretending to be king of the world and make all kind of rules everywhere. Like you cannot make weapon ( but we can) no nuclear weapon allowd ( we have a lot )...U.S. is kinda controlling the world indirecly in military power ( which means everytihng since power brings everything..) Not many country likes U.S. only such as ( forgot if it's france or englnd..either one ) will support them becuz they hope to get goodies from U.S....
Most of that is crap. US does not decide whether other countries are in possesion of Nukes or Weapons, its the contries decision. If the country starts developing a lot of weapons, other countries would feel intimidated and that country would potentially be a threat to other countries. That is how the balance of military power is maintained. The reason why the US military has grown so much in power is because no other countries would want to face the entire US head on, and ganging up on the US would just spark off a World War. Please get your facts right next time.
Rage On Dreams
07-06-2006, 03:25 PM
Most of that is crap. US does not decide whether other countries are in possesion of Nukes or Weapons, its the contries decision. If the country starts developing a lot of weapons, other countries would feel intimidated and that country would potentially be a threat to other countries. That is how the balance of military power is maintained. The reason why the US military has grown so much in power is because no other countries would want to face the entire US head on, and ganging up on the US would just spark off a World War. Please get your facts right next time.
IN either case, Iraq was a good example of nuclear weapon being considered as " weapon of mass destruction" yet they never find any of those weapon.
If a country doesnt give up on their "exposed" nuclear plant when U.S. ask to, then somehow, it might be considered as some "bad" guys and gets pwned. U.S. is sticking their nose in EVERYTHING that have a small chance of harming them, that is a fact we cannot denied.
hiboy2004
07-06-2006, 04:45 PM
Because U.S. is pretending to be king of the world and make all kind of rules everywhere. Like you cannot make weapon ( but we can) no nuclear weapon allowd ( we have a lot )...U.S. is kinda controlling the world indirecly in military power ( which means everytihng since power brings everything..) Not many country likes U.S. only such as ( forgot if it's france or englnd..either one ) will support them becuz they hope to get goodies from U.S....
All of your statements are incorrect, or otherwise unnescessary.
"Us is pretending to be kind of the world"
The U.S is, and will always be, a Humanitarian nation. We beleive that all the world should be peaceful, and we will use any means nescessary to keep it that way.
"Like you can't make weapons, but we can"
Have we yet to stop them from creating their weapons? No. Let them make there pitiful technology that can't even come close to touching us. It flew less than a minute, then crashed.
"No nukes allowed, but we have alot"
Actually, we have disabled, or otherwise discarded our Nuclear Missiles. We have possibly one base that still houses them, but we have stopped production of them completley.
"Us is controlling the world in Military Power"
Lets see, if the Russians ever decided to wage war upon the U.S, we would probably be demolished in a matter of days. In the U.S.S.R times, the Russian Government spent almost HALF of the countries annual income on their military. And they destroyed none of it.
"Not many countries like the U.S"
Why do you think we supply over 20 different countries with funding each year? We keep Israel, Afghanistan, Iraq, and tons of other countries afloat with U.S currency.
Pwned.
Khriz
07-06-2006, 04:51 PM
y is there so much war??
dat gets me mad
my bro and my dad r still in da army
das one of da reasons i don lik war
DarkSide25
07-06-2006, 05:12 PM
All of your statements are incorrect, or otherwise unnescessary.
"Us is pretending to be kind of the world"
The U.S is, and will always be, a Humanitarian nation. We beleive that all the world should be peaceful, and we will use any means nescessary to keep it that way.
"Like you can't make weapons, but we can"
Have we yet to stop them from creating their weapons? No. Let them make there pitiful technology that can't even come close to touching us. It flew less than a minute, then crashed.
"No nukes allowed, but we have alot"
Actually, we have disabled, or otherwise discarded our Nuclear Missiles. We have possibly one base that still houses them, but we have stopped production of them completley.
"Us is controlling the world in Military Power"
Lets see, if the Russians ever decided to wage war upon the U.S, we would probably be demolished in a matter of days. In the U.S.S.R times, the Russian Government spent almost HALF of the countries annual income on their military. And they destroyed none of it.
"Not many countries like the U.S"
Why do you think we supply over 20 different countries with funding each year? We keep Israel, Afghanistan, Iraq, and tons of other countries afloat with U.S currency.
Pwned.
"The U.S is, and will always be, a Humanitarian nation. We beleive that all the world should be peaceful, and we will use any means nescessary to keep it that way. "
If you believe it will be peaceful, tell that to your president. I mean WTF the U.S. attacked Iraq with the reason of "Weapon of Mass Destruction" which was never found. And Iraq is now suffering under the U.S. control. Humanitarian? I don't think so.
"Have we yet to stop them from creating their weapons? No. Let them make there pitiful technology that can't even come close to touching us. It flew less than a minute, then crashed. "
I would see you say that when the missile hits your country. Hopefully at your house.
"Actually, we have disabled, or otherwise discarded our Nuclear Missiles. We have possibly one base that still houses them, but we have stopped production of them completley."
And this is not threat enough?
"Lets see, if the Russians ever decided to wage war upon the U.S, we would probably be demolished in a matter of days. In the U.S.S.R times, the Russian Government spent almost HALF of the countries annual income on their military. And they destroyed none of it."
Russia didn't go snooping around for weapons of mass destructio did they? And in the U.S.S.R times... You mean they are going to fight with guns from 20 years ago and still win?
"Why do you think we supply over 20 different countries with funding each year? We keep Israel, Afghanistan, Iraq, and tons of other countries afloat with U.S currency."
I don't see any proof. And even if the U.S. are funding them, they are doing a bad job at it. Present day Afghan, Iraq and Israel are not really advanced are they.
Rage On Dreams
07-06-2006, 06:50 PM
My bad is mistyped a sentence in my post.
" U.S. is pretending to be KING of the world"
There it goes. The guy above who said U.S. is and always will. Toob ad that tons of scientist predict that U.S. will eventualy fall due of their gigantic debts to their ownself and other country.
Please do not think that U.S. has a technologie that is WAY more advance than the rest of the world. Talking in average lifes in one country, japan holds the best technologie. While U.S. investigate their money on military power, Japan developped their country to the poitn where even a parking lot is manipulated Tokyo Drift? that is the truth of Tokyo) Also do you really think that such an advanced country liek Japan wouldnt have any defence? I doubt it.
If U.S. have a advanced weapon dont even think it will NEVER leek out of the country.
Lastly, dont think U.S. is all powerful, a lot sof country dislike U.S. bossing aorund their economic and military. U.S. DOESNT ALLOWD any country to build things that will harm themself.
No time to correct typos sorry hafta hurry for work.
hiboy2004
07-06-2006, 07:32 PM
Do you really think the U.S has unlimited money to spend? Go look around on the Internet, you'll find your proof.
The Missile flew 40 seconds, go check News.com. I severley doubt it will hit my home on the other side of the world from it. Central America wouldn't be in danger from their missiles, even if they did get their maximum range.
Iraq isn't suffering, it is actually prospering. The Iraquis recently (not that recently, but hey) held their first fair election in over 20 years, and thats only if we intervened. WMD's weren't the only reason we "attacked" Iraq. We were trying to releive the Iraquis from Sadam.
That isn't a threat seeing as though its only a rumour. I only heard about another base still housing them.
The Russians have missiles, bombers, tanks and such from only about 15 years ago. And seeing as how Russia is so close to the U.S, if the established a base in extreme Eastern Siberia, they could probably decimate the Western and Central U.S.
Saint
07-06-2006, 07:45 PM
I don't see any proof. And even if the U.S. are funding them, they are doing a bad job at it. Present day Afghan, Iraq and Israel are not really advanced are they.
Are you fucking kidding me? Israel is a very, very powerful nation and you think the US isn't funding them? The only reason Israel isn't in a war with the rest of the Arabs and probably winning is because the Arabs aren't starting it. Read your history books on the previous Israel vs Arab wars. Also, we just bought the Afghani military a shitload of new weapons.
arbalesto
07-06-2006, 08:39 PM
Do you really think the U.S has unlimited money to spend? Go look around on the Internet, you'll find your proof.
The Missile flew 40 seconds, go check News.com. I severley doubt it will hit my home on the other side of the world from it. Central America wouldn't be in danger from their missiles, even if they did get their maximum range.
Iraq isn't suffering, it is actually prospering. The Iraquis recently (not that recently, but hey) held their first fair election in over 20 years, and thats only if we intervened. WMD's weren't the only reason we "attacked" Iraq. We were trying to releive the Iraquis from Sadam.
That isn't a threat seeing as though its only a rumour. I only heard about another base still housing them.
The Russians have missiles, bombers, tanks and such from only about 15 years ago. And seeing as how Russia is so close to the U.S, if the established a base in extreme Eastern Siberia, they could probably decimate the Western and Central U.S.
Right after the US intervened do you know how many people fought against their own neighbors because of the different sect in religion? Iraq was OK before America started the war and tried to keep the government "afloat" they ruined EVERYTHING.
America doesn't know how Arabic countries work and using their own methods won't work there, they don't need a fair friggin election, they need a certain sect of the Muslim religion to be president because that way their own people wouldn't fight against each other.
Also the election is hardly fair, America made the person they WANTED to win the election WIN.
Rage On Dreams
07-06-2006, 08:50 PM
Right after the US intervened do you know how many people fought against their own neighbors because of the different sect in religion? Iraq was OK before America started the war and tried to keep the government "afloat" they ruined EVERYTHING.
America doesn't know how Arabic countries work and using their own methods won't work there, they don't need a fair friggin election, they need a certain sect of the Muslim religion to be president because that way their own people wouldn't fight against each other.
Also the election is hardly fair, America made the person they WANTED to win the election WIN.
Same goes for afghanistan, the president is some1 very close to U.S. thus selected by U.S. anyway. I dont call Iraw's election FAIR when some1 voted for the wrong person, they get killed outside the building. ( If you watched the news when there was actually an election)
BTW Saint, if you want to be looked as a ncie person, dorp the F word please.
Isreal isnt powerful but it's backup is power - U.S.
Deimos
07-06-2006, 08:56 PM
i agree with BOD. end these lame wad posts about china. who cares about a country that can only afford to pay its people $150 a month. plus they have the worst ever toilets.
stop wetting your pants about the east.
Saint
07-06-2006, 09:13 PM
I would like to see proof that the United States set up a puppet ruler. You are pulling all of this out of your ass as you go along. How is it possible to set up a puppet ruler IN A FUCKING DEMOCRACY. You would have to set up 200+ different senators, etc. That didn't happen. You phail.
PowerGamer
07-06-2006, 09:26 PM
"Not many countries like the U.S"
Why do you think we supply over 20 different countries with funding each year? We keep Israel, Afghanistan, Iraq, and tons of other countries afloat with U.S currency.
Pwned.
yup he's right, like here in Israel, the goverment gets money to support the military effort.
Manic
07-06-2006, 09:27 PM
I laugh at whoever said Israel was not very "advanced."
Rage On Dreams
07-06-2006, 09:37 PM
There is no proof that there is puppet ruler nor does it have any proof there isnt. If only you guys read and listen to some program about some scientist discussing about U.S. relaiton to the country it "invaded", some politics show you would pretty much hear what some of us have mentionned earlier.
It just like how come U.S. have such a GREAT relaitonship to a country they nearly destroyed everything??? Also, dont think U.S. just rescue the country, it ruined many lifes and killed many. Terorism....jsut for the oil field buddy. ( Bin Laden is a close friend of the Bush's family if some of you ignore....)
Voortman
07-06-2006, 09:43 PM
rage on dreams you mam are an idiot.
Fieren
07-06-2006, 10:57 PM
Rage On Dreams you better not be suprised if a hate topic pops up about you. Im not gonna start it of course but I swear a lot of people hate you now. it might be a lot worse than the blinddagger case too.
Mossa TheGreat
07-06-2006, 11:19 PM
Just shut up already...
The USA and Israel, plus hidden Germany and Russian companies have enough power to blow this entire world off...
Now that China have made some un finished technology you want them to look bad? Jesus and all the other religious dudes should see this!
I mean sure sure it is bad with new weapons and stuff... But there is enough already to be afraid of THAT... Why not notice THEM for an exhange...
If you have a boy drawing a bomb you go "Ohh, he want to blow things off" But when you see actually army blowing stuff up you're like "That was good! They should show them who role this world" Give me a break...
I am a guy that believes if all the idiots out there worked on technology, we would have gained a world as far in technology as all the Sci-Fi novels have in them together! :rolleyes:
Deimos
07-07-2006, 01:05 AM
The USA and Israel, plus hidden Germany and Russian companies have enough power to blow this entire world up...
Now that China have made some unfinished technology you want them to look bad?
true.
but it the west runs the world and we dont like anyone who rocks the boat.
Saint
07-07-2006, 01:58 AM
( Bin Laden is a close friend of the Bush's family if some of you ignore....)
Oh my fucking god. Can I ban you for that?
Fieren
07-07-2006, 02:16 AM
( Bin Laden is a close friend of the Bush's family if some of you ignore....)
Oh my f**king God...... I thought that squirrel thing of yours was retarded..... God dang. I just have no idea what to say for this. Even the most insulting words cannot fit how I feel about that quote.
If not a bannable offense than maybe a warning or two, or five?
Uskae
07-07-2006, 02:47 AM
There is no proof that there is puppet ruler nor does it have any proof there isnt. If only you guys read and listen to some program about some scientist discussing about U.S. relaiton to the country it "invaded", some politics show you would pretty much hear what some of us have mentionned earlier.
It just like how come U.S. have such a GREAT relaitonship to a country they nearly destroyed everything??? Also, dont think U.S. just rescue the country, it ruined many lifes and killed many. Terorism....jsut for the oil field buddy. ( Bin Laden is a close friend of the Bush's family if some of you ignore....)
You give conspiracists bad names. Watching a Micheal Moore film or two dosn't make you politically knowledgable. You have no clue what you are talking about and typing random BS as you go along does not change this fact.
Your probably saying this crap to sound intelligent. You fail in this aspect.
iCeyWoLF
07-07-2006, 03:03 AM
You can't exactly warn. We all just feel extremly offended. I mean Americans. Not I. Just I don't like the way he said that.
Rage On Dreams
07-07-2006, 04:55 AM
To me, I just hate U.S. pretty much. A nice country but lead by a " ****" president makes it bad. Indeed Fahrenheit's movie or documentary might not be totally WRONG but neither of you guys can say it's right nor bad. Since there's not only that documentary which says, think and try to prove that but threes much more political image that supports it.
I usually watch a Chinese program which talks about all kind of things that happens in the world and before I continue, I would like ot say . " China is not all powerful and I doubt they will start a war." To continue, 1st since I'm not very convincible to you guys then read this. Quote to Elrond.
Bush and Middle East economics.....
Interestingly enough, there is a fierce debate on Bush stealing oil vs. not stealing oil. And the premisis seems to concentrate on the fact that stolen oil is not showing up in the states because prices are high.
Among Bush's allies are a number of noteworthy lobby groups:
- Weapons industries
- Oil industry
- Large corporations
- Armageddonist religious groups
All of the above thrive on a war agenda. With the army needing equipment and ammo, the weapons industry is doing great. With uncertaintly and a volatile market, $72 for crude is making the oil industry uber rich (check the figures on profits). Large corporations (Halliburton) are also making a killing in providing logistics for the army and through international contracts. In addition, these large corporations benefit from Bush's tax cuts immensly. And the armageddonists just live of the fear of war and are always preparing for war.
The average US tax payer doesn't really factor into politics equation since an average tax payer won't make the same contribution to an election campaign as one of the above.
The US economy used WWII to overcome the economic devastation of the great depression. And throughout the cold war, "war" played a key role in the US economy (armament, etc). After the cold war, a new enemy was needed. Otherwise the whole war component of the economy would crumble. And thus, attention was turned to the Middle East, specifically Iraq. Thus, the war component in the economy got rejuvinated in a major way.
Now to the Middle Eastern oil. It is a known fact that there are 2 oil markets: standard market and black market. Saddam Hussein used the black market to make tens of billions of dollars during the embargo to sustain his regime. The "royal" families controlling oil-rich countries in the Middle East also use the black market. For example, the region's largest oil producer at about 8 million barrels a day is governed by a royal family. This family pumps a few million barrels a day on the black market. The revenue from the blackmarket goes to teh family.
But how would Bush steal that? Not directly; and not in a cowboy style train robbery! First, the royal families are "advised" to invest in certain companies. They comply! The revenue is put in bank accounts in US banks (giving strength these banks and their owners). And these royal families make certain donations to certain organizations.
But the biggest money-maker is in the weapons industry. These countries purchase tens of billions of dollars of weaponry that they do not use. And every few years, they upgrade it. And so, the money goes back to the weapons manufactorers and large corporations, who are repayed in favor and are indebted to those who brought the arms deals their way.
And it is a known fact that the budgets of some of the oil-rich countries are drafted by US experts, and then approved by puppets who cannot say no to the US!
The thing about US foreign policy is that Americans have a duty to understand and assess their administrations' (Bush and others) foreign policy. Although, things outside the safe borders of the US do not seem to have any impact on the US, the truth is that they do. Just take the $3.00 per gallon as an example.
When pics of Abu Ghraib, guantanamo, and recently Haditha (to list very few) pop in the world media, public opinion vis-a-vis the US is affected.
But to bring it closer home, Americans now should be asking why their sons and daughters are dying in Iraq? If Bush has come out and said that the main 2 pillars of the war (WMD's and suspected al-Qaida links) are false, why the continued loss of lives?
Some might argue that the troops are there for freedom and democracy! But that's as preposterous as the first claims of the war. A country doesn't need 130,000 foreign troops occupying it to make it a democracy. And if the US has to occupy every country to make it a democracy, then the whole US population would have to be enlisted in the armed corps.
There is some serious high-level corruption and manipulation of American sentiment by the Bush administration. It is an administration that has made mistakes of colossal impact on the US. Funds were taken from the New Orleans levies renovation to help fund the (futile) war in Iraq. Who paid the price? A few thousand Americans lost their lives, hundreds of thousands were displaced, and about 100 billion dollars of damages were caused.
What did Bush and his cronies pay for that mistake? Nothing.
I bet the Bush's stupidity in New Orleans outdid the planning of terrorists for decades with regards to inflicting damage on the US. No one could have caused more suffering to Americans that Bush and his incompetents and warmongers, whose priorities do not include the welfare of Americans, but on pacifying them to get their votes.
Check to costs of the war to see how much American citizens are suffering for Bush's egocentric, narcisstic war in Iraq: www.costofwar.com
Also, A U.S. House of Representatives subcommittee approved a bill on Wednesday that would give another $50 billion next year to President George W. Bush for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. This is just a small drop in the bucket; but it is translated into about 1,000,000 new jobs if the money is invested in the US economy!!!!!
That should convince you guys about the Oil stealing issue.
Bush is a retard and we all know that. I'm quoting since you guys doesnt like me typing.
: He stole the Florida election (thousands of blacks that were from a pro-Gore community were denied thier right to vote, the order coming from Bush's bro in florida. Had those people voted, Gore would have won)
2: He stole the Ohio election (hundreds of dead people voted, all for bush, and in neighborhoods where the people were primaraly pro-Kerry, they were told confusing instructions on where to vote, often ending up sending them to where there was no voting booth)
---Let it be known that in BOTH elections, ALL anomalies favored bush. It's a given that anomalies may happen, but these were huge anomalies, they all favored bush, none at all favored the oponent, and it happened twice in a row. Something like that doesn't happen twice in a row)
3: He put a compleat idiot in the UN, to top off the distruction of our forign affairs
4: He appointed the founder of a cult-like teen "rehab clinic", where the teens were abused, ambassador of Italy
5: Condones tortore.(the only reason you pass a bill that will make it legal for you to torture is if you want to actully do that)
6: Compleatly ignored Katrina for the first day after the disaster
7: Appointed a very incompitent person at the head of FEMA
8: Has put this country in the largest debt in our history
9: Compleatly fucked up our economy
10: Hasn't made any good jobs. (yes, he has made lots of jobs, but they are all minimume wage jobs, and you can't even rent an apartment with that money)
11: Ruined medi-care
12: Dismantaled our enviromental policys
13: Spied on US citizins without a warrent, BREAKING THE CONSTITUTION, AND COMMITING A CRIME AGAINST AMERICA
14: When we had Osama cornered, we suddenly went to Iraq, allowing Osama to escape
15: Launched a pre-emptive strike against Iraq without a real reason.
16: Give tax cuts that go to the rich, the poor only get pennies
17: Is doing nothing about the GENOCIDE happening in Darfur.
18: Is giving companies such as Haliburton no-bid contracts, allowing them to just milk the goverment for money
19: Will be building the world's largest embassy in Iraq; which will have it's very own power, water, and waste station that will function 24/7; while the rest of Iraq will only have some of those, some of the times.
About Bush and Osama's relation
http://tvnewslies.org/html/bin_laden_ties.html
So once again, if I offended anyone then I apologize but then do as you wish. I don't really care if you hate me or not.
Saint
07-07-2006, 04:59 AM
Oh wait you're taking everytihng you say from that website? That explains it.
arbalesto
07-07-2006, 05:30 AM
Oh wait you're taking everytihng you say from that website? That explains it.
Saint did you even bother reading the two quotes she posted? I'm not sure whether or not she got all her facts from that one website but as you already know it's kind of hard to understand her writing. FabiaN and Elronds posts basically state what shes trying to say (I'm guessing).
You guys have to stop being such jackasses to ROD even if you guys completely disagree with what she's saying. You're a moderator and I expect a mod not to flame a fellow member of onRPG. In fact I think it's expected of EVERY member not flame a fellow member (myself included so in case I flamed anyone on a previous thread I apoligize).
Loric
07-07-2006, 05:35 AM
Saint did you even bother reading the two quotes she posted? I'm not sure whether or not she got all her facts from that one website but as you already know it's kind of hard to understand her writing. FabiaN and Elronds posts basically state what shes trying to say (I'm guessing).
You guys have to stop being such jackasses to ROD even if you guys completely disagree with what she's saying. You're a moderator and I expect a mod not to flame a fellow member of onRPG. In fact I think it's expected of EVERY member not flame a fellow member (myself included so in case I flamed anyone on a previous thread I apoligize).
I couldn't agree more.
This has gone far enough, you guys. This went from discussing a political subject to ganging up on a certain member for her beliefs. Be patient with others and respect what they have to say.
Topic Locked.
vBulletin® v3.6.10, Copyright ©2000-2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by
vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8