I am credit to team.
I am credit to team.
Same old driving around in a tank, same old shoot other tanks for half an hour until they die with fucking armor piercing explosive rounds.
Pisses me off.
Seriously though, stop bitching. Both look great, and both look just like their predecessors.
Playing Cypher OBT. Pretty fun game just trying to figure out how to max out settings and if it's already maxed then it doesn't look all that great lol.
Just my two cents as a student game designer:
"It's hard to create new things dealing with army, so they use existing situations but change around pieces to make a different scenario."
That's about 80% of showcase games these days. The only ones who are "original" are indie games and the occasional genre changer that appears every now and then.
Edit: If it refers to the graphical resemblance, then I agree with Reefer about how BF3 looks completely different from it's predecessor, and MW3 is the same engine just tweaked a bit.
i dont understand why this shit about wich game is better , both are good games
IMO ,mw was always better , loved the campaings even when their are just scrips but with a solid story with enough twists
Man I hate seeing DFO shots because I got to level 60 as Godhand Aka Monk.(way before the new dungeons came out forgot what the place was called but where you go to the new town in the boat after you talk to the chick) and I got hacked so I quit and seeing those shots makes me Q_Q Wish nexon would give me some items back I even have screenshots still :/ spent over 200$ Q_Q lol
MW3 brings nothing new to the table. Same old story. Russians are bad, Americans are epic and save the world.
Every game after MW1 was slapped with 1 or 2 new mechanics (Care Package, etc) and called a new game.
The Head of Activison, in control of the development companies, wants you to give him as much money as possible. Bobby Kotick said he didn't really care for making fun and innovative games, as long as he gets money out of it.
BF3 is not a sequel to Bad Company 2. It is a sequel to BF2, which was one of the most innovative games of its time and is considered a pinnacle of gaming.
So, What new things does battlefield 3 bring to the table? apart from a new engine...
onrpg is getting worst..no one is aloud to like both games, one always has to be better than the other..
I don't know many gamers who have bought CoD just for the story line alone, they do it for the online play. CoD makes a great arcade series, but really, that cow theyre milking is getting old and stale.
MW and MW2 were the only massive changes in CoD, afterwhich it just became the same old shit again and again and again, maybe adding 1 or 2 new things after you pay 60$ for what could resemble a addon.
Last edited by TreyTrey12; 06-07-2011 at 01:37 PM.
Candy got any High level that can boost in Sky tower? i got the moneys ofc And yeah i play from sweden like a boss