Therefore, when a person claims known false accusations and misinformation as truth, it is implied that they didn't read or research the information I provided, or they lack reading comprehension (or other small possibilities that I don't think apply in this instance, such as trolling). From here, I apply process of elimination. Kashis, overall, has reading comprehension acute enough to decipher basic speech and concepts, because he has exemplified this through previous threads and posts. Thus, leaving the only possible outcome that he hasn't researched the topic, and has even admitted his source are some girls on his FB, who are apparently enough to tarnish the entire feminist movement consisting of MILLIONS of individuals globally.
Is it not safe to say that a person who states a completely opposite statement of what a movement does has not actually done research?
If a kid was required to read pages about how the sky is blue and says the sky is blue because space is blue, can we not accurately assume he didn't complete his homework?
Do I need to create more examples?
As a person who frequently reads and posts in the links I provided, I know exactly what feminism stands for and tries to achieve. While there are some small things here and there and radical minorities I disagree with, it is rare and the movement is still overall empowering, educational, and inspiring for people of all backgrounds and orientations. To state otherwise is slander.
guys we should set tuxedosam and duby up on a date
Oh my god you all ****ing terrible people. Literally all of you. Holy ****ing shit.
[EDIT]: Except Oister. He's pretty apathetic and that's not terrible, just apathetic. Which is KIND OF THE ****ING POINT. Who the **** cares what gender a person is they are still a person. Treat everyone equally. Holy shit people. HOLY. ****ING. SHIT.
Last edited by Riz; 08-09-2014 at 03:17 AM.
[19:45] ♥Moloko Lynx♥: Flight sims would even suit you, Riz. You seem to have the sensibilities of an old man.Member since May 8, 2004.