For me, its due to the limit of colors it uses. As I always say... "Even a Blendypen has more colors."Quote:
Originally Posted by Thas
Printable View
For me, its due to the limit of colors it uses. As I always say... "Even a Blendypen has more colors."Quote:
Originally Posted by Thas
I'd have to disagree. A large number do, but there are some good ones.Quote:
Originally Posted by Thaurlach
http://s30.photobucket.com/albums/c3...rantrue/Tenvi/
That game has a lot of interesting looking places. LaTale, Wonderking and even MS have some decent graphics.
wow doesnt have bad graphics.... it just looks abit.. different from other mmo's i enjoyed the graphics and ppl forget that it only runs of a 1.7GHZ and middle-standerd G-Card
but i know me and the others will get flamed by those fannies of the game but
straight down, because of the time they took to design the graphics in the game, and still failed - would have to be Darkfall
World of Warcraft graphics were okay, the game had the smoothest gameplay ever though.
http://screenshot.xfire.com/screensh...c0a6a8e17d.png
Poorly done troll. Admittedly it's not the best looking game, but, hardly the worst looking.
Anyway.
Worst looking game for me is Mabinogi. I know a lot of people say 2D games are worse looking than 3D games, however, personally I think that a poorly done 3D game looks worse than any 2D game. It's mostly the character design, UI is hideous too.
WoW's graphics are pretty bad.
I just find it funny cause nobody has called the WoW-graphic haters for trolls yet... Lulz, FF online has a place in all ya hearts i see..
And that picture aint convincing Cingal. Look at the ground... its STRAIGHT. at least in wow there is some variations and even in games like AoC and WAR there are grass... hell, even in Shaiya and Regnum there are snow or grass.
do you know how old is FFXI sure its old enough to have a excuse for the graphicsQuote:
Originally Posted by Drinko
WoW graphics aren't that bad at all, or was I playing a different game for four years?
Yes, because the only part in that picture is the ground right?Quote:
Originally Posted by Drinko
FFXI looks orgasmic for its age!
i mean.. 2001/2002
whats the big deal .. drinko.. i mean really? FFXI is a older mmo so of course it won't be perfect and just because there might not be any of you beloved grass does not make it the #1 worst looking mmo... so just sit down and chill out
LOL XD but he deserved it XDQuote:
Originally Posted by Drinko
Good game and all. But Runescape.
May 16, 2002, to be exact. It is also capable of letting dial-up players play as well, due to the "gimped" graphics.Quote:
Originally Posted by hyarume
And no, it doesn't look orgasmic. Compared to the game released before it, X, it looks like crap. But, it was online therefore meant for bandwidth issues.
Fail, bandwith and gfx are not related, its all seen as objects.
It does support dail-up
But for the time being 2002 and 2001 IN JAPAN!!!
It looks Orgasmic!!!
FF11 looks decent in the 200x150 thumbnails that keep getting posted. But in an actual resolution like 1600x1200 it looks like garbage. Its not that bad for its age though.
And lol at people trying to bash on RS, at least they update the engine and improve graphics. Korean mmorpg clone #94969643369, they all look the same especially the anime-esque ones. Some just have textures some don't. Some have a blinding glow, some don't. But when it comes to actually updating the game, nah they just release a "sequel" so everyone has to start over.
that is because 1600 X 1200 is not supported and you have to ajust registery settings to get it right.Quote:
Originally Posted by Lorddias
But you can enhance it quite a bit.
Terrain is most things for me. Its plain and ugly. No textures ( big fail)
RS has better graphics... it even has grass muhahaa