this is my latest sig,yup,it's a vector sig(i vectored da render by myself and added the shading to it): http://img220.imageshack.us/img220/2...monkey2ma0.jpg
ratings/comments? (rate outta 10)
Printable View
this is my latest sig,yup,it's a vector sig(i vectored da render by myself and added the shading to it): http://img220.imageshack.us/img220/2...monkey2ma0.jpg
ratings/comments? (rate outta 10)
Well. I can tell your quite new to Photoshop.. Correct me if Im wrong. Ill give it a 7/10. Some pointers, Simplicity, Is good but not always. Try staying away from vectors, As the result is pretty nice, But the signature itself is to easy. If you have Photoshop cs2, Pm ill give you an easy tutorial on how to make a simple sig:)
i use gimp 2.2.12 and this is i think only my 4th sig and vectors are not as simple as u think n vectors help u bring out ur originality as u can see
k,added da border
7/10 I think its plain...also text needs work
Erm. Mr. Attitude. You're asking to Judge your signature, We never gave permission to judge others. Vectors are just an easy click of a mouse. Its just a brush. It is simple, And it is used mainly for newbs( New to Photoshop,Gimp). Dont spaz because someone degraded your signature. You asked for the critisism, If this was on Gamerenders you would be warned.Quote:
Originally Posted by bountyhunter113
Umm well I know what looks good, and nothing matched my sig...so I left it out?
lol my bad for postin dat,deleted the post and vectors are not made for newbs and are not just a "click" it takes awhile to make a render into a quality vector and making the design of ur text compliment ur image takes hard thinking, if u go to gimptalk.com and look at curly's tuts for vector sigs n vectoring renders a lot of L337 @$$ ppl took the time to use the tuts and said it took them while to doQuote:
Originally Posted by Realism
The text is hard to see. 8/10
>.< I hate monkeys.
>_> ,yea i think i should change the part of the text where it says bountyh and monkeys pwn :teeth:Quote:
Originally Posted by ChicaQueenOfWarGames
Heh go family guy lol. The render's quality is kinda low, the background is a little too random (Looks like you just took different colored brushes and splattered them all over a white bg), and the text doesn't match in color and is kinda choppy (may just be the font though). However, I kno you're fairly new to GIMP so 7/10. PS:I really like the second siggy you have in your signature ^^.
5/10. Too many things clash, background is wierd, doesn't look appealing.
erm to let u ppl know i didn't jsut slap a bunch of brushes on the background i used the render>nature>flame tool and then i had to go throught some more steps then use gradients on the flames i used like 6-8 diff flames behind the monkey(and that evil monkey is from family guy) also bg isn't white i changed color of it to the color of the monkey's shirt then i made it really light
well i personally dont think you should put a white outline on your font when its a white background.
its alright for a 4th sig 8/10
ummm as i said in previous post the bg isn't white and i didn't make white outline on the "evil monkey" text i just duped orginal layer then set gaussian blur to 6 then i added more layers and made diff layer types,anyways i know i'm not good with text,but ty for all ur ratings/comments they really helped,well most of emQuote:
Originally Posted by SPECTRE
well the main part of the background looks white... or it is really bright so it doesn't match the font..Quote:
Originally Posted by bountyhunter113
omg dude........use the eyedropper tool on sometin pure white then compare it to my bg and u will see the differenceQuote:
Originally Posted by INHANDER
Text: 5/10 [ Bad Text ]
BG: 6.5 [ Its not THAT bad.. but its just that i saw so many better vectors, but i have to say.. i never tried dooing vectors so your better than me with it i GUESS
Render : 8/10 [ You didt not blend it, but thats good in this sig.. although i dislike the trick stroke around it *which was with the render auto. i guess*
lol ok regardless of what you did, we're rating it on what it is and what we see. We see a white bg, a background with a bunch of random brushes, unmatching text, and a somewhat low quality render. : /