Is there a difference between the two, or is anarchy simply complete, 100% freedom? I'm writing an essay on this, and I'm curious what you think. I think complete freedom is anarchy, and complete freedom would be balls.
Printable View
Is there a difference between the two, or is anarchy simply complete, 100% freedom? I'm writing an essay on this, and I'm curious what you think. I think complete freedom is anarchy, and complete freedom would be balls.
anarchy is the lack of government, as in 100% no government, so yes freedom from the government, basically.
it would be the perfect system under the assumption that people did the right thing ALL the time. but since they do not, the system fails. the people need a government to control them due to that.
on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being anarchy and 10 being full government control, id say america is 3-4
Anarachy does not =/= freedom, you have more freedom in todays culture why? In anarachy anyone can kill anyone, that means they will (lets face it peaceful anarachy would never happen). So unless you call living your life constatly looking over your shoulder as true freedom well then more power to ya.
This link may be helpfull didn't read through all of it but seems to be based on same subject matter (the social contract) http://www.constitution.org/jjr/socon.htm
scorpio
Freedom and anarchy describe the best and worst thing that man can do with the same state of affairs.
Pure freedom? That leaves the world open to chaos and peace freely. Both able to touch people and either destroy or build. There is no such thing as absolute freedom in a world of more than one person. In a world where any action can be disapproved of in any way than there can be no absolute freedom. No 100% freedom.
But whatever.
Read up on the story of Agamemnon and how he died.Quote:
Originally Posted by Oisterboy
I guess you should know about Penelope and how her courtship company came to end by the return of Odysseus, or Helena, the reason that the Greeks campaigned against Troy.
That is basically all the people cared about at all some 3000 years before now.
Hollywood...
2 people -> children
That's the only point of relationships and (openly) non exclusive ones don't have any.
Anarchy eh?
You know how fast the world would get taken over by dudes with guns?
And who is going to be working?
It's instant lose.
So your implying the world is not all ready taken over by dudes with guns?Quote:
Originally Posted by Elion
scorpio
Anarchy isn't freedom as you'll have gun toting bast***s trying to **** you over and make you into a secks slave o.o, read too much fist of the north star ....
Freedom is what most people have. The ability to go about life unhindered in any reasonable sense.
Certain things are deprived of us that shouldn't be, but that's life. Total freedom cannot exist because that IS anarchy and anarchy is stupid. It doesn't work. The proof being that it has never worked.