Norrin lives on in hian. :eye:
They help you understand and what to expect when dealing with relationships. The stepping stones basically. People simply don't know what they want. Im not exactly the best person to give relationship advice, but honestly not all highschool relationships fail. Usually its because the guy just gets bored of the girl and moves on; this is always the most common case. Then theres the "Soft" guy who gets cheated on by his gf. Honestly you have to try to be in the middle area.
Love your girl, treat her right and hope she does the same in return. Regardless though, someone is always going to love more than another in the relationship.
Since you are intent on discrediting what I post, I'll stoop to your level.
Epistemology 101: The foundations of things you know or believe to be true
- Expert testimony from someone int he field of study (you don't know what my field of study is)
- Experience
- Baseless Assumptions you understand to be true if it comes from one
man **** this thread and all these big dumb *** posts. Yall go way to far just to prove another wrong.
I don't have problem with a block of text.
I have a problem with UNNECESSARILY long thread.
More irrelevant prattle. You dogde my claim (1)that you started to respond without firstly reading through my post by saying (2)you used the term "assume" as a way of indicating that you cannot, after all, know if what I'm saying is truthfull.
I further commented on the dubious nature of that, since the rest of your post doesn't follow the same pattern
Am I the only one who can see the irony in this?
I Lol'd. Clearly you live in a fantasy world if you think it's "usually" because the guy gets bored, when you finally become a man you will realize we don't have as much power in a relationship as you may think.Quote:
but honestly not all highschool relationships fail. Usually its because the guy just gets bored of the girl and moves on;this is always the most common case.
If being betrayed by someone you trusted makes someone soft, then you are even stupider then I once thought.Quote:
Then theres the "Soft" guy who gets cheated on by his gf. Honestly you have to try to be in the middle area.
Ahahaha classic.Quote:
Love your girl, treat her right and hope she does the same in return. Regardless though, someone is always going to love more than another in the relationship.
Seriously though, the statement "Happy wife, happy life" can be applied to all relationships and while incredibly simple, holds so much truth.
I can give you a colouring book and some crayons if you like.
olaph when he got together with his baby mama they didn't agree on not seeing other people.
Cause when you don't talk about it makes it ok so stop it.
/sarcasm
my last few threads have always started long conversations.... why I ask?
And im not a deranged social path.... I just don't see why some people care so damned much at times.
Well, I think, hian you should take "anti social" for what it is; A description of "not normal".
Now we had this talks about the Socratic method and all that, so let me ask you the following starter question:
Is normal good, bad or neither of both?
I side with neither of both. If normal isn't one of both, ab-normal can't be one of both. If all it means its "not normal behavior", it can't be negative to say about someone that he isn't acting very socially.
Nit picking beyond the regular use of the word? Probably. This comes from the word being a contraction. Aside from it's definite meaning "not normal" it also can additionally mean "beyond what is accepted" and "beyond what should be accepted".
I think you read it as the later and i think the former was intended.
~+~
Calling someone "antisocial" can be quite an insult. I was called that once in a quarrel and all I came up with was something along the line of "What does that say about you, to say something like that?" I actually stoped to care what the quarrel was about at the spot, I was really shocked. When you aren't indifferent about the point you make and in the middle of clarifying yourself, it's pretty strong;
Hence I don't like the word, because it can be quite an insult.
However, I wouldn't say about myself that I would never use it. Also seeing what it amounted to and deducting that it was probably not a good idea to use it; Any idiot can try to be smart about what is what, way past the results are in.
The only second real sticking point I detected was the academia discussion.
Well, I could do a rant about that too, both sides have points going for them. It would be more interesting, if there where real hard findings on distinct consequences. My senses tell me that they aren't there because this is a different topic than "teenage heroin abuse". When I try to look at the cause effect cascade, that teenage relationships kick off, I simply don't see any.
You can only study relations between causes and their consequences real well when they are there. After that you can try for an ethic assessment.
With the matter at hand: It simply doesn't matter at all.
It's a question of taste.
Just to shoot of an example:
First "real" kiss; Had to think for a second when and with whom that was. Then I remembered. I also remembered that it was with tongue and while it was a good kiss, I found out it wasn't that great for her, because of the sheer pressing weight of any implications of kissing with tongue and what everyone would think and so on. That consequently amounted to her demonstratively ending any relations with me for a while.
Embarrassing little story, but I can't detect how it had anything to do with anything that ever happened in my life at all.
Then what's the point of eating? You eat, but 2 hours later you're hungry again. (Weird comparison, I know...)
btw, I've been reading the last few pages now, but damn! Hybrid makes some long *** posts. Respect to the people that actually bother reading that crap, cause I can't get further then his first 3 sentences before I get bored....
Not all marriages/romantic relationships that end are a result of cheating.
But in spite of the fact that the sanctity of marriage in this day and age where you have shows like "The Bachelor" are quite prevalent, many people still have some hope to obtain a monogamous relationship. So for some people the idea that it is possible does exist.
I'm not sure homo sapiens were supposed to be monogamous. I just happen to be (or believe I am) in a monogamous relationship because I'm too lazy to juggle the emotional baggage that comes with sleeping with more than one person. One man is crazy enough. Why would I want to juggle the demands and needs of two of them?
I'm not trying to say that guys are crazy, insane, and carry varying degrees of mental (and sometimes) intellectual quirks. Just that it's hard enough to maintain a single bond with one person of the opposite gender given his set of personality traits and needs.
And no this does not mean I would accept the fact that he is cheating me (if he is). I told him up front that if we get married it's death do we part. He commits Adultery/abuses alcohol/abuses me, I'm going to become a widow, get a tattoo that reads "Rest In Peaces (insert hubby name)", acquire all his assets, move on with my life.
PMS is a rather funny occurrence. I know when its coming though. Usually it starts with facebook posts, having "omg i feel so sick" "omg im in so much pain". Then the mood swings start kicking in.
Shes angry, then aggrivated, then happy, then crying.. And thats when I hit the smut and come back on the 15th ~