Battlefield 3 or MW3

Printable View

07-11-2012, 05:37 PM
Deadrika

Battlefield 3 or MW3

which one you perfer?
honestly i have MW3 , im thinking on buy BF3 but alot of my friends tell me its isnt worth it and that is a bad game for the PC
07-11-2012, 05:42 PM
marcipaans

MW3 for a quick game you can hop in and then go on with your life.
BF3 is a lot more "slower" compared to MW3 and is much more about vehicles, patience.

Your friends are obviously CoD fanboys.
07-11-2012, 05:46 PM
SnOwBunZz

I'm seconding marcipaans.

BF is also a lot more realistic than MW3.
07-11-2012, 05:51 PM
poeticas

What an STUPID Question ! *cough* Bf3 *cough* Its all up to you ! *cough* bf3 *cough* You will be playing and i wouldn't dare say that BF3 is WAY BETTER I Would Never !
07-11-2012, 05:51 PM
Deadrika

i see , thank you
07-11-2012, 10:57 PM
Deadrika

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jin-Roh

BF3 is a superior game but it also requires skill to play. In MW3, you can just go around using extremely op guns, then nuke the map and pretend you have skill.

i see, so let me ask 1 thing , that i said previously
imagine you have a Steam with 84 games and 0 on your Origin account , are you going to get a Origin account just to play BF3? and do you think its worth that extra work?
07-11-2012, 11:02 PM
egoodie

both good game in their own way but personaly i like mw3 cause the campaign is the shit
07-11-2012, 11:10 PM
Jakuza

Yeah, I prefer MW3 for it's campaign, but BF3 for it's multiplayer.
07-11-2012, 11:19 PM
MinistryOvWar

I prefer Arma II over any of these joke fantasy shooters made for 9 year olds.
07-11-2012, 11:21 PM
Spunkify

Planetside 2 all the wayyyyyyyyyyyy
07-12-2012, 01:59 AM
Deadrika

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jin-Roh

That's what everyone else had to do. What extra work exactly? Putting in 2 minutes to register? You tell me if a few minutes is worth an epic experience for years to come. I was not exaggerating when I was talking about the games, just so we are clear. COD is like the shooter for 'special' people who just wanna run around with recoil'less 1 shot guns and then call in a nuke that literally kills the entire map and then get constantly rewarded for it having the game pretty much kiss their arse every time they get a kill. BF3 on the other hand, requires skill and when you get a kill, it's not because you just sprayed in a direction, but because you worked for it. COD games only have small maps with small player numbers while BF3 has that but also supports large maps with larger player numbers with optional vehicle combat, a more epic feel and just generally a better game. Here is one reason out of a million why MW3 is just bad... Snipers 1 shot no matter what and they require no scope time to have 100% accuracy. Yes really, you just point, click both mouse buttons at the same time and instant death to anyone in your way. Not only that, you can then attach a screen on your gun that shows you where people are at... Compared to every other game ever that pretty much requires you to get a headshot for a 1 shot kill and you don't have 100% accuracy until you scope in for a few seconds. In COD, you also have amazing accuracy without ever zooming in... Not to mention hitboxes are wonky and you can 'wanted' shoot at someone and somehow hit them.

Note the 'wanted' shots where he curv shots and it actually works because of bad hit detection. Note 1 shot no matter where he hits. Note the little to no scope time to get full accuracy. Note the amazing accuracy even without scoping in.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZF1LYKSQdxE

Note no 'wanted' shots as the hit detection is superior and not cheap. Note that 1 shots only happen with head shots. Note the required time to aim and even then you never have full accuracy. Note being able to snipe people out of helis... You're going to say that is not epic?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v6h4nSoRtB8

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JX800dubwqs

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DewV6CYIRUc

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CYXPwHw_wGg

true and btw sorry for being a pain on this , i buy russian keys so basiccly insteand of paying 60$ or euros on the game i only pay 18$ or euros
i just want to get a good buy you know and plus neither of my friends have Battlefield 3 so thats another problem i think
07-12-2012, 02:07 AM
BoomThunda

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jin-Roh

BF3 is a superior game but it also requires skill to play. In MW3, you can just go around using extremely op guns, then nuke the map and pretend you have skill.

That's what I do!
07-12-2012, 02:19 AM
Deadrika

Quote:

Originally Posted by BoomThunda

That's what I do!

lol xD , im not really good at MW3 , i have it almost for a month now and im still lvl 47 , i dont play it that much neither , thats why im asking about BF3
07-12-2012, 06:07 AM
Phobia

BF3 is better but to get the most enjoyment out of it, I suggest playing with some friends. I had BF3 for xbox and found it so much more enjoyable when I had a couple of pals playing with me as opposed to me just joining a game by myself.
07-12-2012, 11:50 AM
Deadrika

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phobia

BF3 is better but to get the most enjoyment out of it, I suggest playing with some friends. I had BF3 for xbox and found it so much more enjoyable when I had a couple of pals playing with me as opposed to me just joining a game by myself.

exactly , i dont know if its worth playing it alone
07-12-2012, 12:43 PM
PugsPwn

I've been a pretty ridiculous amount of hours into BF3, and I can honestly say I have loads more fun playing it than I ever had on MW3 or any COD game. The action in BF3 compared to MW3 is a lot more tense. I can easily walk away from a game of rush with only twenty or thirty kills and be completely content with the game I had played, because the sense of accomplishment is far greater than a game of Domination in COD could ever dream to have. Through the entire game you're constantly adapting your tactics to meet the changing battlefield, rather than just running and gunning. Even soloing in BF3 is more fun (but, maximum enjoyment comes from a full squad).