WOW, I wasn't expecting that. Can't say that I was expecting Runescape/Maple Story either, because if any of you have seriously played either one of the games you would know that they are awesome.
Printable View
WOW, I wasn't expecting that. Can't say that I was expecting Runescape/Maple Story either, because if any of you have seriously played either one of the games you would know that they are awesome.
FFXI pc is rated 85% so its crap cuz its the FIRST attempt to multi-console it?
(did i post this?)
L2 is like awsome, but reviewers hate grind so.. there u go.
Wow, I'm amazed at this list, but then again, this is strictly P2P mmo's I guess. Most of the worst P2P's have already shutdown or went free. But I still can't believe L2 is up there.
Just like your opinion? Their's was an opinion too, at least all three of those games have a large population which mean the mass enjoys it, that's all that pretty much matters.Quote:
Originally Posted by Cingal
That's your opinion I suppose.Quote:
Originally Posted by Satio
They can't say wow, cuz there to scared blizzard will seu em.
Engrish sorry,
I agree with everything. RYL 1 was pretty shit. I really never made it far because gets so boring and glitchy so fast. But RYL 2 kicks ass.
Dude are you serious? This list is COMPLETELY backwards -.- well they aren't the best games but a lot of those were ****ing amazing and ones like L2 actually helped define the ****ing genre..I mean what the hell dude...
Matrix online 1.0 used to be horrible, but its been fixed up a LOT now and its much better though the only thing I hated was it costs 15 bucks a month.
They can't put WoW on it because of the features and all the items and all that shit.
They can't say Maple Story because of how it started PQ's and Jumping quests and had great control. Out of the other side scrollers, you have to admit MS ranks 3rd for the great handling of your character.
They can't say runescape because its frigging JAVA MMORPG with tons of features and blah blah. Though graphics suck and fighting is lame, they still added all those stuff that dug it out of the whole, and it isn't full with hackers and bugs.
This list is complete crap. How can anyone say L2 is one of the worst? RFO, I can see it being up there though. For a once p2p game, it has no content.
But now it's just a generic all-out mad high ass mega wooping grinder.Quote:
Originally Posted by korncob
(Not talking about Private servers).
They really never ahd much features except the PVP which only happened up at high levels.
And it was P2P too? Like wtf!
Exactly.Quote:
Originally Posted by Cingal
FFXI is a great game, and has lasted strong for 5 years.
"Hard to swallow Subscription prices" -its 12.95... WoW is 15...
and the Xbox version does have Achievements dumbass.
And lineage 2? Come on, who do you think your fooling?
I'm guessing your a wow fan boy...
The only games I disagree in this list is
Final Fantasy XI
Vanguard: Saga of Heroes
Lineage II: The Chaotic Chronicle
Thats my own opinion, dun hate
Anyways guys, you can't hate on the list because it's made from gameranking.com
So that means that every ranking website(in the network) were put all together and the average for all of the games came out to these low scores. That means they must of been bad for high end critics to review them so badly. And multiple of them to get that low average. So... even if you like it, doesn't mean it's good.
This list is horrible. This is one of the top 10 worst top 10 list I have ever seen. Maybe only like 2 or 3 of those games actually belong on the list. And it seem's kinda unfair to throw old ass mmo's on that list.
But then I look at it from P2P only and then well I guess the list is all right. Except that some of those games are free now.
"I never heard of this but it sucks."
LOL gamerankings.com is a joke, at least for MMO's they are. That means they rate the first versions of them and such plus a LOT of critics get paid off to give better scores and a LOT of critics might have certain preferences when they played the game so its complete and total bullshit.
We all know reviewers dont have the time for it so call it crap'.
2ndQuote:
Originally Posted by Mxerdude
i mean, RYL had one of the most genious fighting systems ever used in an MMORPG. just hack that sword away and hit anything that comes too close. You could group up to 30 monsters that way. Then slam in a majestic rank 3 skill and the show was completely.
i do agree, that today, it's graphically to be considered outdated, but nonetheless ...
Provided by Gamespy
* Terrible for small party/casual players Wtf? Two people can party -fine-
* lag in graphically complicated areas That's their computer. Not the games fault.
* poor chat system and guild management tools Have they even played C5 and above? Clan system got a huge rework.
* minimal character customization About as good or better than every other game.
Yeah, they're ******ed.
I smell RYL3? :) that would be freakin tizzles if there was...but sadly its probably not going to happen.Quote:
Originally Posted by neothaka
I also loved how they took out lag by making it client based and not server based.
And i give #1 for worst rating to OP
#1-#3 is completely junk. Those games do not need to be on that list, specially not that low. I mean where is Runescape for goodness sake!
I just started RYL2 recently, its alright, the graphics are dated, but extremely flashy at the same time. I mean wat other game do u kno has a skill that creates a huge fire tornado lol, incredibly flashy.
Crazi lol.
That shit blows, putting P2P MMOs and Free ones together automatically makes it shit.
SHIT.
AAAAAAAAAAAAAARGH.
How the hell is FFXI one of the worst games ever? That's not even logical.
Man, I'm sorry, but this list is dumb.
Lineage and RF? Wtf? and FFXI is pretty good, but the game doesn't even really start till lv75.
They don't change the ratings after the first patch. Once game releases they play and write about it. And it's done. They don't follow the game as these errors get fixed.Quote:
Originally Posted by Jrgsubzero
It should of been done before hand.
Exactly my point, thats whats causing all these new games to have 20 betas and 10 open betas so that their fully ready to release -.- so stupid.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sylce
I don't think this list can be good. Only the popular games are listed in here or the ones that got advertised somewhere. There are games that are unknown and may be bad.
The title should be Top 6 worst MMORPGs from my experience.
Lol, problem is that they change about 2% of the errors, then wonder why the games getting frowned upon.Quote:
Originally Posted by korncob
No WoW
No RuneScape
No MapleStory
Fission Mailed
My list of Best MMORPGS ever is your version backwards :)
Dude... who the hell wrote this. What a freaking noob giblet head. It actually had L2 in there. Just WTF?
they could have put Fiesta Online, Deco Online, and one other mmorpg as the top 3~ but then that would belong in a "Top 6 Worst F2P MMORPGS List" wouldn't it?
Cause WoW isnt crap. Buy a lvl 70 character and see why the game is one of the bestQuote:
Originally Posted by Cingal
Maple Story has that "fun" factor for kids. The game is ridiculously simple compare to most other games
Runescape, although has terrible graphics, still has a very nice mmorpg feel with all these different side skills. Most mmorpg only has a fighting system and no fishing, mining, etc.
Lineage 2 is like one of the best made Korean games out there too. Final fantasy XI is like one of the best Japanese ones. This person is right stupid.
If Lord Mog says FF XI is good, it's damn good.
Haven't played most of them, though, L2 was sexy.
Guys, guys. If there is one place to put the blame, it is not on the OP nor the writer of the article, it is gamesrankings.com where this data was taken from. I really think that it would be good if reviewers re-reviewed an MMO a period after its release. That is one of the hardest things about reviewing MMOs, they are constantly changing, many times for the better, so a review made when an MMO would often be radically different if the same game is reviewed 6 months or a year later.
Either way, for the list, I think it is pretty inaccurate. Though I do know Vanguard had a pretty disastrous release, but I hear it has gotten much better.
Worst list ever , do not give the reject space chimp the keyboard anymore. all those games where good. I d Rohan , in RF Online's slot.
runescape cannot be on the list and even though we all hate it.
there are far to many young people/computer illiterate players that think the game is awsome so they put out great reviews.
same with maplestory.
wow is the biggest mmo on the market today so for that to even be on the list wtf? are you retarted?
the gameplay may not be what u want but it has the largest community in an mmorpg. so the fact that u say it sucks is fine you can have you opinion.
but lets look at wow logically,
Wednesday morning at the Austin Game Conference it was announced that World of Warcraft has hit 7 million active subscribers world-wide. While the number doesn't surprise us -- as we've yet to see an MMO present a serious challenge to WoW's dominance of the genre
Well it didn't happen within 2007 as quite a few people predicted, but World of Warcraft has done it-- Blizzard has announced that their massively multiplayer game has hit ten million subscribers worldwide.
10 million people play. thats more than anyother game out there. so if the game is so bad why are 10 million people playing? common sense dictates that it cant be as bad as you all make it sound.
while i dont lay wow and prolly never will. youve got to respect that these number show that it must be a decent game.
im waiting for stargateworlds to come out:)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sabertooth77
Rohan isn't out yet so to give it a bad review is completely ignorant Sabertooth77.
... lol, this thread made me quit OnRpg. People are stupid. =,= See ya in a couple of weeks when I mysteriously reappear.
PS, that list sucks, but that's someone else's thoughts so whatever.