Originally Posted by Greed
It wouldn't be hard, WoW is not a continuation of the lore so much as it is a ******ed toddler flinging shit all over the walls.
Reputation: 58
It wouldn't be hard, WoW is not a continuation of the lore so much as it is a ******ed toddler flinging shit all over the walls.
Reputation: 43
Meh I didn't really like Warcraft 3.You can be good on Warcraft 2, but Warcraft 3 is totally a different thing.
They kinda singled out the units too much making it feeling like you were only controlling one person mainly.
Reputation: 65
That is probably the best explanation of WoW lore I've ever heard.
Reputation: 785
I would really like it if Blizzard made a new franchise instead of another Warcraft game.
Reputation: 10
Warcraft 2 has kinda overpowered Orc units though, especially with Bloodlust as opposed to the *OH SO GREAT* paladin heal.
Warcraft 1 had clunky handling with a maximum selection of four units.
Reputation: 38
korean, it had to be them
Reputation: 15
Haha, ofcourse that doesn't work man. What do you think, the enemy just lets you build a base and upgrade it all? You cant really be serious right
Reputation: 132
Wow. Blizzard is a beast.
Reputation: 10
Most noobs I know love to play like that. I think it can work in Command and Conquer, but not in Warcraft.
WoW is the milker not the warcraft series.
Reputation: 11
NO BLIzZARD DO NAWT BETRAY US PL0x!
just concentrate on lich king and stfu
Reputation: 46
Omg this better be a troll.
Reputation: 19
Posting Permissions
