Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 26 to 36 of 36

Thread: Square-Enix now owns Eidos...

  1. #26
    OnRPG Elite Member! Reputation: 151
    Vesper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    In a parallel world.
    Posts
    6,101
    Rep Power
    23

    Default

    Square has been failing hard for the past 9 years, doesn't make sense to acquire Eidos.

  2. #27
    42 Reputation: 18
    rhdonald's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    931
    Rep Power
    15

    Default

    meh Square Enix Eidos sounds so weird :O
    Currently playing League of Legends. Summoner name : Don

  3. #28
    OnRPG Elite Member! Reputation: 176
    Wicked315's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Florida.
    Posts
    7,829
    Rep Power
    21

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hyarume View Post
    If microsoft would own SE, SE is doomed...no more great RPGs.. no more fun!..

    If that happens, I prolly will no longer be a square enix fan.
    I agree, but in a less fanboy type of way. If Microsoft WOULD buy it. (Doubtful)

    Then Ps3 will be receiving no good RPGs. and I refuse to buy an Xbox360 when I already own a Ps3. So I wouldn't play their games anymore.

  4. #29
    Murxidon's Maid Reputation: 22
    TrayDay's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    2,090
    Rep Power
    18

    Default

    Eidos with Square Enix.
    Not bad combo, But pretty big combination don't you think.
    Well they are expanding, and that's good news for Square Enix fans.

  5. #30
    Super Duper Uber Mega Ultra Extreme Reputation: 15
    Haku_Honjo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    East coast, USA.
    Posts
    866
    Rep Power
    17

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hyarume View Post
    If microsoft would own SE, SE is doomed...no more great RPGs.. no more fun!..

    If that happens, I prolly will no longer be a square enix fan.
    No no.. SE being owned by MS would be a good thing. Finally they could steer clear from that crap fest known as sony.

  6. #31
    Fabio_R's Fruitcup Reputation: 72
    leathel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    3,616
    Rep Power
    18

    Default

    While the console lovers are here may i ask the question i have been wondering for ages.

    What do you all get out of saying one console is better than the other? If its yours and you enjoy it good for you right?

    It happens with everything i guess games/music/sports but its just stupid if you ask me.

    Maybe its because i normally get all the existing consoles so i never feel like ive missed out. But seriously getting defensive because you like something is silly.

    And how the hell/Why the hell did someone say Microsoft should buy SE. Think about what type of games SE produce and what their main market is. Then think about how Microsoft deal with their products and what their main market is.

    Some people >_>.....

  7. #32
    Super Duper Uber Mega Ultra Extreme Reputation: 15
    Haku_Honjo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    East coast, USA.
    Posts
    866
    Rep Power
    17

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hyarume View Post
    I rather have MS out of the console market, they are the ones that are playing filthy.
    I dunno about playing filthy or any of that and I'm not a MS fan. My playstations just fail before my other consoles and I blame sony for being a crappy company. Before anyone says it I always take care of my possessions and don't leave them in hot/dusty areas. Nintendo if anything is the best on sheer console life span. None of these things break.

  8. #33
    OnRPG Elite Member! Reputation: 228
    cinderboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    The Internetz
    Posts
    13,426
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cannibalisme View Post
    Is just me who think that, Eidos got better games than square by far.

    Square didn't make any good game since 2000. It's been almost 10 years of suckage for them.
    i wld like to have a company which sucked for 10 years... but still earn enough to buy over other companies...

  9. #34
    Phantom's Freak Reputation: 80
    Torian's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    2,579
    Rep Power
    18

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Onifiro View Post
    They released...


    STAR OCEAN: THE LAST HOPE (2009) 360

    KINGDOM HEARTS Re:Chain of Memories (2008) PS2

    THE LAST REMNANT (2008) 360

    Infinite Undiscovery (2008) 360

    FINAL FANTASY FABLES: CHOCOBO'S DUNGEON (2008) Wii

    DRAGON QUEST SWORDS: THE MASKED QUEEN AND THE TOWER OF MIRRORS (2008) Wii

    Dawn of Mana (2007) PS2

    Thats all of the console games they have released since 2006, along side the 22 handheld games they released.

    Kids on the internet are getting dumber.
    oh wow, I didnt enjoy any of these D; *kills self*

  10. #35
    Still learning the ropes Reputation: 10

    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    27
    Rep Power
    17

    Default

    I doubt you have played half of them.

  11. #36
    Diddy Kong's Boxers Reputation: 17
    shofuji's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    661
    Rep Power
    16

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ChickenDewd21 View Post
    I'm sensing life bars and platforming in Tomb Raider being replaced by numbers and slow-paced battles. Did I forget to mention massive fan service? 8D Tomb Raider Fantasy: Lara Gets Naked. TBA.
    You realize Lara being naked is nothing new...I mean, she already has HUEG OVERSIZED CHEST and a nude patch was made for her first appearance.
    (Also, the battles are increasing in speed(See KH, SO, other action RPGs) and platforming is slowing being added to SE's RPGs. ;P)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •