Reputation: 103
...Originally Posted by Celor
Runes of Magic and World of Warcraft are very much different.
One is a wow clone and one is wow.
I played Runes of magic for >hour... rom sucks.
I know I can't base it off less than an hour but it sucks.
Final Statement :
Your argument is invalid.
Reputation: 22
In my opinion, there are better MMOs out there then WoW. So no.
Reputation: 87
Blizzard would be an idiot to make WoW F2P. It currently holds like what, 60% of the mmo market? Since it would never happen, I can't give you an answer.
Reputation: 22
The question is IF it happen. Not would it.
Reputation: 296
Screw WoW and give me F2P UO.
It's about time, seriously.
Reputation: 10
No ty.
blehhhhhhh
Reputation: 87
Well, if it went F2P, I'm sure most things would be restricted. So..... No.
Reputation: 132
No.Cuz F2P would kill WoW.WoW is just meant to be pay to play,and Blizzard wont change something that works flawless so far.
Reputation: 198
what about getting paid 500k to have a WoW logo advertisement tattooed to your ***?
Reputation: 296
How about one W on each butt cheek.what about getting paid 500k to have a WoW logo advertisement tattooed to your ***?
Reputation: 128
dear god no.
[taiko][/taiko]We're so legit we can play kingdom hearts TWO PLAYER without looking.
Xente: Wait, your cock has wings?
Xente: ****ing awesome.
Reputation: 45
Taiko, you know you'd play it.
Reputation: 119
Nah I really, really wouldn't..
Reputation: 120
Everyone in this thread that said no is secretly in love with WoW and would play it
Reputation: 23
I wouldn't even play WOW, if it was completely free without a CS.
Note: I have tried WOW before. I've been through 3 or 4 trials to give it a good chance, but in my experience with WOW. The game just really sucks and its not my cup O' tea. If you love it, good for you.
Reputation: 96
Possibly, but probably not for long.
»Games & IGN«•Wurm Online » Leviathan••FFTA2•»Last updated May 31 2010«
Reputation: 60
i would play cheeseburgers if it was f2p
Reputation: 13
WoW is already shit and I wouldn't even play it now cause of WotLK. If it became F2P then it would become cash shop dependent, a crap load of advertisers would spamm, and quite a few hacks would be released. Making any game F2P from P2P is a VERY bad move...
Reputation: 125
Why the **** would they do that? Their profits would plummet, the game would be thrown off balance and just be completely ******ed.
I think it's an awful thing to even consider hypothetically.
Reputation: 20
if the cs was more like maple, where the cs items are more for looks than gameplay, or at least, they dont give too much of an advantage, then for sure, i would.
Reputation: 201
I didn't even like WoW when I paid for it.....why would I go back if it was free?
She knows how to party.
Reputation: 34
To all those haters that barely got half way to the end game, or people who just think they are "superior" because they don't/cant play it (who obviously either are too young to find a way to pay for it or simply cannot afford it), or people who just think they are cool because they are on the wow bandwagon of haters who never even played it:
http://www.wow-annexe.fr/voirvideoj.php?id=548
Theres a little bit of end game world pvp on a warrior.
Reputation: 6
Actually at end content most people are doing raids, I noticed that because I hardly ever see people with pvp gear its mainly Ulduar/Nax gear. And I got a lvl 71 dk and 56 hunter and I still love the game but I get bored of it every once in a while.
Reputation: 40
Depends on what server and battlegroup ur in, along with the population. PvP is always goin on on my pvp server, BG's always full to. Not so much with pve and some normal servers.
Sadly most of the PvP is at 80 also, such as Wintergrasp, which is always a huge world pvp siege battle. One thing WoW did great with PvP are the siege battles imo. Siege engines and what not on other games ive played havent been as good.
Reputation: 95
I would play it. It's better P2P though.
Posting Permissions
