what one do you think is better.....i like true blood myself because that's how vamps a supposed to be
what one do you think is better.....i like true blood myself because that's how vamps a supposed to be
Reputation: 10well i dont know, maybe either one of them mostly i want to be bitten by the vampire and i just want like that being a vampire with a gift of super speed.
well dont take this seriously because it just my imagination of my interest being a vampire, a vegetarian vampire.![]()
i lieks angel sexing buffy kay kay?
Reputation: 47C'mon now, we all know by now the reactions you're gonna get making a topic bout Twilight.
The whole point of Twilight isn't vampires obviously.
What in the world is True Blood? o_0
For vamp books Laurel K Hamilton pls. They're pretty risqué.
Reputation: 10true blood is a cinemax series about vampires. google it. anyway. both suck
its a dumbass tv series about vampires that vampire fans can watch and have wet dreams about pretending to be vampires whilst they write vampire stories on their vampire only vampire-blogs that only their vampire loving internet friends bother to read (of which there are far too many).
its like buffy the vampire slayer with all the best bits taken out and ******ed political messages thrown in.
you want to see the ideal vampire? Go play vampire: the masquerade bloodlines, that's how a vampire is supposed to be
Reputation: 167Good game and I enjoyed LARP but they are not even close... Their Vamps are based on DDO vampires. If you read the first module that Strahd and Ravenloft was introduced in, you can see that the basic social caste that Masquerade uses. Just in Masquerade, they renamed them, and placed the castes in a modern day enviroment.
Reputation: 64Devil May Cry