My god if I was was the reporter the man would have been dead before I finished the interview.
Reputation: 10
My god if I was was the reporter the man would have been dead before I finished the interview.
Reputation: 18
I could find out a lot while watching this video except that the fatty there sexually harassed boys but he's not registered as a sex offender which can pose a problem.
The reporter was just provoking the man for the purpose of shocking the audience.
I think pedophilia needs much harsher punishment.
Reputation: 10
Like the death penalty?Originally Posted by Kostolomac
Reputation: 74
********.jpg
Aussies, no surprises there.
Reputation: 64
i loled so hard.
YEEEeeEEESeesszzzss they about molesting BOOIIiiiz
GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG grub
lol
Reputation: 134
Yes lets all get angry at the man who is obviously psychologically damaged.
I guess you can't really expect the average person to put more thought into it than "Dirty disgusting pedo and it's all his own fault wahhh!" though.
Unless he personally hurt some of you, you don't really have any excuse to be angry at him.
Reputation: 10
That guy is a completely MORON!He did not know what he said..
Reputation: 47
The "ploy" can be effective to take out premeditation, premeditation in attempted murder, assault, or the charges placed against the man who was sentenced. If the fact that he had beat the man was used against him. For Example: He had not known how hard he was hitting the man, only that this man had violated their home and compromised their families safety. He was not willing to let anything happen to his family, now or in the future. This is only brought up if there is no other evidence in the case to support the defense, and is up to the defendants testimony to carry through.
With the subject of killing to prove a point and killing to avoid a greater danger. phycologically we all as human beings handle mental trauma differently. We cannot account for ones circumstances and genetic makeup that regulate biological changes within the body (working or not). If he were to be killed, by those suffering from trauma, depending on how you define death (biological or not), it could be justified as self-defense (not in the court of law). Inadvertent murder happening to one that excercise control over one's emotions up to the breaking point, to suicide. Killing to prevent that and enable closure. Killing becomes a point through the killing to prevent greater danger to 2 over the 1, the point becoming the closure and a message of how pain is recapitulated over time. how dramatic.
Reputation: 43
No he wouldn't.
Posting Permissions
