Probably Loose Change, but (as someone who believes in the conspiracy, sortof) Loose Change is really ****ing stupid.
Reputation: 1151Probably Loose Change, but (as someone who believes in the conspiracy, sortof) Loose Change is really ****ing stupid.
Yep, thats the one, thanks.
How is it stupid though? It seemed really legitimate when I watched.
I mean, the facts, calculations, and all were pretty correct.. or not?
Reputation: 132
Reputation: 1151
Reputation: 132Here I found it for you Hatashi. Bunch of crap as I said.
http://www.america.gov/st/webchat-en...0.9919245.html
Reputation: 29
Reputation: 1151
Reputation: 292The person making the argument does not change the validity of it, unless it is from a witness testimony that is not verifiable.
Loose Change should be called "Ignoramus Makes Fallacious Statements".
I can't wait for these nut jobs to move on to something else.
Sometimes I think they should force people to take critical thinking classes.
Then they can understand how idiotic their arguments are.
Reputation: 132Thanks guys.
It sounded pretty convincing and legitimate in class >_>.
Reputation: 29I still belive 9/11 was an inside job :0
Reputation: 292