I believe you need this.
Also just so you know the bible has had so many revisions throughout time.
And the King James version "which seems to be the most popular" is the worst version.
If you are arguing from a historical point of view then yes some of the things that happened in the bible had similarities.
But it is not a very good reference to use for historical events especially the more exaggerated claims.
When you have the words "consistent" and "bible" in the same sentence it makes me think you never read the bible.
Or that you only read bits and pieces and ignore everything else.





