I liked Homefront's campaign, it was very emotionally balanced imo. Multiplayer wasn't anything notable.
Haven't played the other two.
Reputation: 492
I liked Homefront's campaign, it was very emotionally balanced imo. Multiplayer wasn't anything notable.
Haven't played the other two.
Reputation: 882
i quit brink after 1 map it was just horrible to me, i never seen or done homefront so... so far crysis 2 was best to me, i got bored halfway trough the singleplayer but i had my fun with the multiplayer.
Reputation: 15
Multiplayer focused for me.
Also,add BFBC2 to that list.
So Crysis 2 thus far...
Reputation: 265
Haven't played Brink.
Crysis 2 is awesome, great graphics, music and the singleplayer campaign is pretty awesome (although slow at first)
Homefront is garbage, the singleplayer was short and stupid, multiplayer is average.
Edit: definitely BC2 though, awesome game. A bit frustrating at first if you're used to something like CoD because it's more team-based and really hard to go hero mode and mow down the other team even if you're really skilled at FPSes/
Reputation: 15
Alright,Crysis 2 or BFBC2 then?
Peak.
Reputation: 492
BFBC2, I'd say. Loved the multiplayer.Originally Posted by Peakevo
Reputation: 28
i wont to try crysis2 so bad for single player
Reputation: 15
How much people use vehicles in BC2?
A lot..hate that stuff,prefer infantry.Tilting towards Crysis 2 now lol.
Reputation: 28
dose crysis2 have destructible like crysis one?
Reputation: 492
Vehicles enhance gameplay moreso than anything, personally. I like somewhat strategic shooters rather than those that only require infantry.
Crysis 2 has many infantry benefits that I would place on the same level as having vehicles, but I guess it's your choice.
Reputation: 15
Alright man.Really liked Crysis 2.Does anyone know if its dying?Only fear really.
Thanks,
Peak.
Reputation: 25
I'd get Brink over the other two because the devs. actually care about the game and because it's different from ye olde FPS.
Posting Permissions
