PS3>XBOX360>Wii
which next generation console is the best best
Reputation: 10
PS3>XBOX360>Wii
PS3>XBOX360>Wii
which next generation console is the best best
Reputation: 10
1st off, your title says ps3 is better the xbox 360, and the 360 is better then the wii.
3ve off, I think that the ps3 and the wii are the bestve.
Reputation: 10
Wii>PS3>360
Reputation: 10
Wii<PS3<Xbox360<PS1<Dreamcast<Xbox<PS2<PC
PC ftw!
Reputation: 10
Buying a 360 is kind of pointless to me. You can get most of the great 360 games on PC, so I really could care less about it ^_^.
I'm waiting for those final bits of information as it is, as of right now PS3=Wii.
I'm just worried that the only great Wii games will be at the beginning of the generation, and 4 years after the launch I'll regret buying one.
Reputation: 11
I'm going to have to say:
Wii = PS3 > X-Box 360
Reputation: 12
The Wii Looks So Frucking Awesome
Reputation: 10
I agree with you. xbox in my opinion sucks. But I'm looking more towards getting the wii then the PS3 but still they are both pretty close.Originally Posted by ZeronX
I'm going to have to say:
Wii = PS3 > X-Box 360
Reputation: 34
How about we wait untill all of them are out before we start judging. How bout it?
Because I swear i'm ****ing tired of these threads. The pc pwns all, period.
Reputation: 10
Don't you want to be the first of your friends to have one though so you can gloat it in their faces? Maybe that's just me.
Reputation: 10
PS3>wii>X360
Reputation: 12
first wii looks like total crap. PS3 is way too expensive. So that leaves me with xbox 360
x360 > PS3 . wii
Reputation: 28
Wii has just been a huge let-down lately. The lack of power is ridiculous. So ridiculous, Nintendo is making a profit on it on launch. If the technology is that outdated, it just doesn't seem like it's worth $250.
The PS3 lacks rumble. It matters to me. I don't trust blu-ray. It supposedly has the same picture quality as HDDVD now, for only twice the price.
I guess I choose 360 for its controller and price.
360>Wii>PC>PS3
Reputation: 18
Nintendo is not making a profit from the console, please give me your sources to tell us otherwise. The technology is certanly not outdated, eg, the wii has 88 megabytes of t1ram and 16mb of sdram, now you may not think that is not much, but the xbox 360 will be limited on it's 512mb of ram (this is because that number is most important to textures and xbox360's ram isn't enough to really push what it wants (1080i/p) which means the xbox 360 will have 4x less ram then it would running 480p (roughly) meaning that it could be summed up at 128mb of ddr ram now this doesn't include that the t1ram is much much faster then standard ddr ram (it's the same speed as l2 cache in your processors that make a huge difference between 1 and 2mb of the stuff.)
Reputation: 28
"We will make a profit on the entire Wii proposition out of the box--hardware and software," Fils-Aime told Reuters. "That really is a very different philosophy versus our competitors. We are a company that competes only in the interactive entertainment space, so we have to make a profit on everything we do."
http://www.gamespot.com/events/wiila...ml?sid=6157690
Regardless, the 360 is obviously still more powerful. It can do effects the Wii can't. I still consider Wii to have next-gen graphics because it's more powerful than the current gen's most powerful console. Red Steel looks great, just not as great as Call of Duty 2 (graphically speaking).
Reputation: 21
^Stop it. That's making you look hypocritical now. When everyone was flaming down carpet, you were talking only about how fun the system would be, not graphics. Obviously Nintendo saw fit to put out what the system would need, not what the system wouldn't need. If it can run the games with no problem, and has the system upgrades to keep the system from slowing down on the net, etc. Then they're alright, because if you haven't guessed, Nintendo lost a lot of money last cycle. So I'd much rather take the innovation over the same-old, same-old with a smidge better graphics.
Wii > PC > PS3 > GC > SNES > N64 > PS2> Sega Genesis > XBOX > XBOX360
Reputation: 28
Wait, you're saying a system needs motion-sensing technology, a speaker built into the controller, and weather and news channels?
Every console can run games with no problems, besides frame rate slowdowns. All three consoles of the next generation has OS upgrades. Sure they lost money with the Game Cube, but the DS has brought in massive sales. It'll be hard to play a Wii game after playing Gears of War in HD.
Wii seems to be more of a secondary console. I'll be getting one to use as an arcade system.
Reputation: 10
Who said that the ps3 won't have rumble tracks?
But seriously rumble... don't be a women.
Reputation: 21
They can say that because a good computer can do more than what a PS3 could actually do. It's more of a decrepit, extremely large, version of the PSP.
Reputation: 10
but a ps3 is only one forth of the price of a good computer.
and the psp doesn't have a "six axis". which is the new controller. So before sayiong what the ps3 can ad can't do, please be well reserched. :3
Reputation: 29
Wii's in the Lead, Xbox 360 in second, and PS3 trailing in third.
Reputation: 21
Real? and the rest are just figments of your imagination?
Reputation: 10
... so wait, if they're figments of your imagination, then wouldn't the ps1 &2 be imaginary also, and the Xbrick, which would make computers Imaginary...
but anywho, I stick with my opinion wii=ps3 ><> (fish) >Xbrick 359
Posting Permissions
