Cs: S

[akm_202]

Whats so good and different on this counter strike?
i play 1.6 and many ppl are talkin bout CS S,

whats so good and different bout it??

no i dont want you to say
"it sucks, go get GW!!!!111"

[Voortman]

Its easier the graphics are better and some of the maps are remade? I prefered 1.6 when I played =D

[Sashimi]

1. Cs:S is more realistic

2. SOme betta guns some shit guns

3. More maps

4. N/A

[shadowsun50]

Better graphics,physics,and server security.......still gotta use 1.6 to hack

[akm_202]

Can you add mods to it??

[AlexanderVB]

CS:S to be simple is just better graphics, changed hitboxes, and more realism.

To get further, they altered the hitboxes so that in the chance that you shoot an awp at someone, you actually have to AIM at the person in order to hit them. Furthermore, they weakened guns such as the MAC-10 and strengthened ES C90.

They also tightened up the graphics:

so that they have a bit more realism to them. Your shoulder is not a corner.


Honestly, its best that you'd try it our yourself to just see what it's like. I'd bug a friend to let you use his/her(girls don't play video games! :P ) copy just to test it out, then to decide whether to play or not.

[FabianN]

Go to wiki and search. I know there is a page that compares the two.
But yea, you can make mods. It's really a lot better than 1.6.

[Runahs]

how does cs:s relate to gw? Wow.... Anyways I like CS:S better because it has more updated graphics and the physics is better....

[Vesper]

That's hilarious, I knew the hitboxes were bad, but not that bad. Not dissing the game in any way (in fact I did waste many hours playing the damn thing), it's just that it still has some flaws.

[FabianN]

Yeah I agree sometimes it is lag...but other times...well here watch this:

The reason is quite obvious.
****ING MASSIVE LAG
He doesn't get over 25fps. A game to run smoothly you should have it at around 40fps, and a FPS it's really recommended to go at 50fps so that it's completely smooth. In a FPS the action is fast and jumpy, and a slow frame rate can cause it to just skip some frames.

His computer is apparently really slow and lags, and because of that the hit-boxes are not where it should be.


I do not get the same results on my system, and I get a normal rate of fps


Edit:
Just looked at it again, there are times when he's shooting that it goes as low as 2fps
He has a shitty system which lags the game. Because of the lag, he has shitty aim-boxes.

[Astaroth]

FabianN ftw!

Btw I think they had enough time to solve every bug, everything should be fine now.

[JacerX]

The reason is quite obvious.
****ING MASSIVE LAG
He doesn't get over 25fps. A game to run smoothly you should have it at around 40fps, and a FPS it's really recommended to go at 50fps so that it's completely smooth. In a FPS the action is fast and jumpy, and a slow frame rate can cause it to just skip some frames.

His computer is apparently really slow and lags, and because of that the hit-boxes are not where it should be.


I do not get the same results on my system, and I get a normal rate of fps


Edit:
Just looked at it again, there are times when he's shooting that it goes as low as 2fps
He has a shitty system which lags the game. Because of the lag, he has shitty aim-boxes.

Ah I see now, thanks for clearing that up FabianN