Results 1 to 20 of 20

Thread: Xbox kills baby, MSFT wants the family to play the company's legal fees.

  1. #1
    Firor's Fury Reputation: 30
    TheRequiem's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    I love you.
    Posts
    3,093
    Rep Power
    17

    Default

    Unbelievable.. Makes me fear overusing my 360.

  2. #2
    OnRPG Elite Member! Reputation: 26

    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    4,722
    Rep Power
    19

    Default

    Wow this is just weak....Microsoft isn't being nice..nor were they ever.

  3. #3
    Pipster's Punk Reputation: 10
    ReGainMadness's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Zhee Netherlands
    Posts
    2,423
    Rep Power
    18

    Default

    Ah damn, that's sick 0.o
    Just like the ps3 is helping finding a cure against cancer.

  4. #4
    OnRPG Elite Member! Reputation: 68
    hobolord's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    australia
    Posts
    5,002
    Rep Power
    20

    Default

    how sad teh baby died

  5. #5
    SuperKenshin's Servent Reputation: 32
    AtomSlap's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    SoCal, US
    Posts
    1,091
    Rep Power
    17

    Default

    I know Microsoft's losing out on a lot of money with their products atm, but compensating a family is not exactly breaking the bank.

    But just imagine their legal fees... ouch. Microsoft aren't really known to be tight fisted when it comes to legal representation.

  6. #6
    SuperKenshin's Servent Reputation: 33

    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    1,078
    Rep Power
    16

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dead Eyes View Post
    christ anything for a knock at the xbox 360.

    The family sued microsoft, microsoft didnt sue the family. Read the article..

    I feel for the family, but they were looking for someone to blame other than themselves for it.

    and microsoft asking them to pay their legal fees was a bit steep...

    The family sued them because a faulty xbox cord killed their baby. Microsoft ADMITTED to this fact 3 months later and started the exchange program. They're not pushing the blame on anyone, it was Microsoft's fault because they can't make hardware worth a damn.


    Oh and don't get on my ass about being a fanboy because you and the rest aren't saints yourself.

  7. #7
    OnRPG Elite Member! Reputation: 123
    Greed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Oakwood USA :O Posts: 9,998,999
    Posts
    12,135
    Rep Power
    25

    Default

    That's just messed up.

  8. #8
    Dixie Banana Bar Reputation: 10

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    276
    Rep Power
    17

    Default

    erm what was an infant doing with a 360? and to think the infant over heated it. usually most xbox games are rated M and an infant should barely be able to grasp the controller. i think maybe its the parents fault for even leaving the 360 on long enough to overheat and even letting the infant to play with it.

    edit: microsoft didn't sue the family the family sued microsoft

  9. #9
    SuperKenshin's Servent Reputation: 33

    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    1,078
    Rep Power
    16

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kRaZyKeV49 View Post
    erm what was an infant doing with a 360? and to think the infant over heated it. usually most xbox games are rated M and an infant should barely be able to grasp the controller. i think maybe its the parents fault for even leaving the 360 on long enough to overheat and even letting the infant to play with it.

    edit: microsoft didn't sue the family the family sued microsoft

    -It wasn't a 360.
    -The baby wasn't playing it.
    -The Xbox didn't overheat. The cord was faulty and was known(to Microsoft) that it could cause dangerous fires.
    -They're counter suing because they fell it makes them look bad. They shot themselfs in the foot really badly because they're counter suing a family who was a victim of shady dealings done by Microsoft regarding the issue.
    -It took them 2 months after Christmas 2004 and this issue(Holiday Season) to alert the owners of said issues.
    -Don't post ever again if you don't read or understand things.

  10. #10
    Dixie Banana Bar Reputation: 10

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    276
    Rep Power
    17

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Neebus View Post
    -It wasn't a 360.
    -The baby wasn't playing it.
    -The Xbox didn't overheat. The cord was faulty and was known(to Microsoft) that it could cause dangerous fires.
    -They're counter suing because they fell it makes them look bad. They shot themselfs in the foot really badly because they're counter suing a family who was a victim of shady dealings done by Microsoft regarding the issue.
    -It took them 2 months after Christmas 2004 and this issue(Holiday Season) to alert the owners of said issues.
    -Don't post ever again if you don't read or understand things.
    u say that it didn't over heat yet

    Microsoft has now officially responded to an Illinois family's lawsuit in which a fire was allegedly caused by a faulty Xbox console in December of 2004. The fire resulted in the death of an infant, Wade Kline. According to the lawsuit, the fire was caused by an overheating power supply, which became so hot as to start the deadly fire. Microsoft, in response, has stated that the fire was wholly the responsibility of the family, and that it was the result of "misuse or abuse" of the console in question. Furthermore, Microsoft claims that the fire was the result of an "obvious" condition of which the family was aware. Considering Microsoft did not recall power cords until February of 2005 (on account of fire concerns) we're not sure to what obvious condition Microsoft is referring. Microsoft is asking that the case be dismissed and that the Kline family pay the company's legal fees.
    -Don't post ever again if you don't read or understand things
    sound familiar???

    btw a faulty cord must be somewhat hot to cause a fire. faulty cords don't cause fires out of nowhere

  11. #11
    SuperKenshin's Servent Reputation: 33

    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    1,078
    Rep Power
    16

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kRaZyKeV49 View Post
    u say that it didn't over heat yet

    I'm sorry I left out the 360 part. You see, I was playing to your stupidity of claiming it was a 360. I'm a neoGAFFER so my jokes don't work here that well.

    faulty cords don't cause fires out of nowhere
    Yes they do. I once plugged in my lawn mower and the cord started to smoke and you could see a fire. It wasn't over heated because I just plugged the thing in. Microsoft made them faulty, Microsoft is the reason the child is dead.

    Microsoft had been covering the issue up prior to the event(just like the Red Rings of Death) now. If Microsoft had recalled the cord when problems began then the child would be alive. They hid the facts to avoid losses in the Holiday quarter.

  12. #12
    Bongo Crazy Kong Reputation: 10

    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    243
    Rep Power
    17

    Default

    Krazy read your post before ever talk again.

    Do you know what a power supply is?

    its a cord. The xbox itself did not over heat.

  13. #13
    500+ Posts???? Reputation: 10

    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    WI, USA
    Posts
    504
    Rep Power
    17

    Default

    Microsoft isn't counter-suing the family, they're asking that the family pay the court fees as a result of the original case.

    Yes, a power cord can cause a fire. It has an electrical current running through it (its called an electrical fire).

    The baby wasn't playing the freakin game (and that's the dumbest reply I've seen yet). The console caused a fire, the fire then killed a baby (seeing as how fires tend to do that... whether you're playing a video game or not).

    Microsoft knew about the issues and admitted it later (hence the recall).

    Therefore, Microsoft is to blame.

  14. #14
    500+ Posts???? Reputation: 10

    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    WI, USA
    Posts
    504
    Rep Power
    17

    Default

    ...you're an idiot.

    And it was probably in Standby. I leave all kinds of equipment on 24/7. (This computer for example)

  15. #15
    OnRPG Elite Member! Reputation: 123
    Greed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Oakwood USA :O Posts: 9,998,999
    Posts
    12,135
    Rep Power
    25

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Khanstruct View Post
    ...you're an idiot.

    And it was probably in Standby. I leave all kinds of equipment on 24/7. (This computer for example)
    Same, but not all the time. Even compy here needs to sleep now and then.

  16. #16
    King Furry Reputation: 447
    Cingal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    12,578
    Rep Power
    31

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Greed View Post
    Same, but not all the time. Even compy here needs to sleep now and then.
    My computer has been constantly on for about the last two weeks...


    I don't see any fire...
    And if the cloud bursts, thunder in your ear.

    You shout and no one seems to hear.

  17. #17
    500+ Posts???? Reputation: 10

    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    WI, USA
    Posts
    504
    Rep Power
    17

    Default

    which is why we're fortunate that MS is primarily a software company... as their hardware tends to explode, start fires, summon locusts, etc.

  18. #18
    OnRPG Elite Member! Reputation: 123
    Greed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Oakwood USA :O Posts: 9,998,999
    Posts
    12,135
    Rep Power
    25

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cingal View Post
    My computer has been constantly on for about the last two weeks...


    I don't see any fire...
    The local Geek Squad told us to let the computer sleep once a week.

  19. #19
    Snakes Big Toe Reputation: 10

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    447
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    umm why would you leave a Xbox/computer or anything on for days straight, your asking for a fire. If they left it on for days then they killed there baby. Careless parenting imo. How exactly did the fire start? YOu buy it your responsibility or jsut dont buy it if you think teh company is bad.

    ANyone heard about the guy who sued a trailer(forgot name of the big vehicles that you can wlak in) becuase they didnt say in the manuel if you leave cruise on that it wont go straight so he leaves vehicles on cruise and goes to get coffee WHILE on teh highway. HE crashes into teh ditch. Idiots that live these days..

  20. #20
    500+ Posts???? Reputation: 10

    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    WI, USA
    Posts
    504
    Rep Power
    17

    Default

    Its an RV, and actually he went to make some pancakes while driving. He sued cuz no one told him that cruise control doesn't mean auto-pilot.

    That was Darwinism at its finest (sadly, he didn't die), but this is not the same thing. Most every appliance can (and is often designed to) be left on 24/7. And NO appliance should start a fire just from leaving it plugged in. That's faulty manufacturing and illegal.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •