
Originally Posted by
Deimos
Yes he was within his rights to do that as freedom of expression.
but to do it and not expect ANY kind of retaliation is ignorant in the extreme.
Purposefully destroying any precious religious text/symbol for demonstrative purposes is OBVIOUSLY going to offend some followers of that religion.
I dont care if all of you are going to get all bitchy and say "omg religion is so dumb, i want to do whatever i want" i would STILL get pissed off if something that meant alot to me was desecrted in that way.
If somebody from america came to my university, came in and gave a lecture about how shit britain was then burned the Union Jack at the end as an example i would have a problem with that, free speech or not.
its the same with an atheist burning or ripping up a bible.
to not expect any kind of retribution is so idiotic, so pathetically purile that i can hardly believe everyone is up in arms over this.
freedom of speech and expression works both ways you know. people have a right not to be belittled or made to feel stupid.
the speech itself was enough, although very course and blase it was enough. ripping a page from the bible wasnt needed. would you rip a page from the quaran in a school filled predominantly with muslims?
probably not, but then alot of people seem to have a problem with christians in america.
religion doesnt rule everything. american public schools dont even have morning prayer like we do in england.